Love your passion mate. Hope you enjoy not being silenced. Sad to hear that you were previously silenced. Haven't ever considered you as the silent type.Problem is whatever you may call us the right, the conservatives the narrow minded who refuse to sing kumbaya. We are the majority and we will not be silenced anymore. Enjoy sucking on your c**k shaped bong.
And you can be that fence sitter that jumps to one side usually the protesters with your rainbow flag while like minded people like myself protect your narrow arse.Stopped reading there, pretty much sums up that you're just an "us" and "them" guy.
Not capable of nuanced understanding ahead of flag-waving on this issue. The type oof thinking that results in wars that were and still are sadly fought over religion.
All the best.
When was the last time a war based on fighting for Christian beliefs destabilised the whole world and killed innocent people in countries not directly involved in the war through terror attacks?Seriously? Northern Ireland says 'hi'. Some would also put Srebrenica at least partly in that category. What on earth do you think happened in Europe in the 30s and 40s? Killing people because of their faith, even if you don't say 'I'm doing this in the name of Christianity' is just as bad. What did the catholic church (at an institutional) do with the Hitler / Mussolini problem?
Obviously I'm also a just some sort of lefty.
Is it bad that i regularly forget what "left" and "right" means? .... never been a real fan of politics
I just dont like do-gooders who do it more for their own ego than anything else
Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ
Don't pretend you are Jesus, Twiz.
Jesus would never duplicate his posts.
That was pretty good.Trans Pacific Partnership is dead.
Pro-climate change action is dead. Coal is great.
When was the last time a war based on fighting for Christian beliefs destabilised the whole world and killed innocent people in countries not directly involved in the war through terror attacks?
The assertion that I was trying to make is that on the whole Christians have progressed whilst our Islamic cohorts have not. They are generally about 400 years behind. And I have to be general about it as there are specifics that people can come up with to continue any argumentThat is not the assertion I was challenging.
The assertion that I was trying to make is that on the whole Christians have progressed whilst our Islamic cohorts have not. They are generally about 400 years behind. And I have to be general about it as there are specifics that people can come up with to continue any argument
Some Christian churches have accepted female ministers. Now whether or not you agree with that when do you think Islam will accept a female mufti? Probably never.
I am not Catholic but even the current Pope (Pope Francis) has been more sympathetic and asked Catholics to be more understanding and tolerant of the gay community. When do you think that Islam will do the same. 400 years? Never?
I am just trying to post what most people that I know think and I don't live in an echo chamber like most of the left or so called modern thinking self righteous, moral crusaders do.
So it was an attempted debating tactic, rather than an actual view (hello Pou).Comparing it to the New Testament, simply on the grounds that you dismissed the NT because the texts we have were written around a century after the events.
There may be other legitimate reasons to dismiss the NT as not accurate, but the fact that the texts we have were written 80-100 years after the events are not a legitimate reason to do so.
Those pesky specifics, getting in the way of bigotry!And I have to be general about it as there are specifics that people can come up with to continue any argument
Lol, just posting what most people you know think, whilst accusing others that do exactly the same as being in an echo chamber.I am just trying to post what most people that I know think and I don't live in an echo chamber like most of the left or so called modern thinking self righteous, moral crusaders do.
People who plead tolerance and moderation are not all self-righteous moral crusaders. How are they more of a moral crusader than those who disagree with them? Some of them just don't want to f**k up our country and world and then wonder 'how did that happen?'.
No it's not. There was a tolerant good intentioned Prime Minister named Malcolm Fraser who refused to pay bribes to the Lebanese Government as did Brazil. Countries that did got the best skilled immigrants from that country whilst we let's just say received a Forest Gump box of chocolates.This is spot on.
I suspect, Avenger would even be rational enough to admit that this is right.