Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 85,099
It’s only bad when foreigners do it, apparently.
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
It’s only bad when foreigners do it, apparently.
Under the previous owners it was a private company free to do as it pleases. Now it’s the global public square and requires extra regulation to protect democracy. It f**king stinks.
Funnily enough I just watched a Whitehouse guy defending Apple's denial of service to Chinese protesters as being fine because they're a private company. Which they're not. Yet they talk about opening an investigation into Musk for removing censorship in what is now a private company.
Ok so where in the HB laptop does show that the President of the United States is getting some sort of a 10% kickback of a grift ?
It's a comment by Hunter.
Well I guess if they don’t watch out they could be held liable for defamatory or dangerous posts. Why should a newspaper or radio station he held liable to damages and social media publishers not ?
www.euronews.com
nexus.jefferson.edu
theconversation.com
I think its an urban myth TBH.
It's Hunter's own communication. No urban myth.
The leaks today revealed that they were not worried about anything you suggest. All they were worried about was coming up with a plausible story to cover the suppression they knew was wrong.Well I guess if they don’t watch out they could be held liable for defamatory or dangerous posts. Why should a newspaper or radio station he held liable to damages and social media publishers not ?
White House keeping a 'close eye' on misinformation on Twitter
WASHINGTON - The White House said
Can Social Media Sites Be Held Accountable for Users’ Posts?
Law and Society program director breaks down Section 230 debate.
A push to make social media companies liable in defamation is great for newspapers and lawyers, but not you
Defamation law reform is on the horizon. Social media companies may be held more liable for what they publish. But this could come at the expense of everyday users.
They’ve had his laptop for three years. Nothing burger otherwise it would have been used in the midterms in November.
Thanks for confirming my point. Other than memes and innuendo, it’s a nothing burger.
The story has been suppressed. This is the whole revelation of today. You are going to be extremely discombobulated.
You think accusations from Biden's daughter about sexual abuse are a nothing burger?
It shows he's a bad father, which is important to a lot of voters.
I agree totally, but it's hypocritical that it's only a problem now the Democrats have lost control of their biggest platform.Well I guess if they don’t watch out they could be held liable for defamatory or dangerous posts. Why should a newspaper or radio station he held liable to damages and social media publishers not ?
White House keeping a 'close eye' on misinformation on Twitter
WASHINGTON - The White House said
Can Social Media Sites Be Held Accountable for Users’ Posts?
Law and Society program director breaks down Section 230 debate.
A push to make social media companies liable in defamation is great for newspapers and lawyers, but not you
Defamation law reform is on the horizon. Social media companies may be held more liable for what they publish. But this could come at the expense of everyday users.
I think you’re putting the cart before the horse. Does anyone tell Murdoch how to editorialise or do some just benefit from his poltics ?
