Non Footy Chat Thread II

[ash411]

This must be part of the sensible debate.

That's f*cking disgusting. All Australians should be ashamed of ourselves that there are people that think this way in our country.

This is your team @Avenger, proud of that are you?

 

[Gronk]

By the way the "source" of the stats are flawed and the author is a Catholic priest

http://amp.slate.com/blogs/outward/...is_a_dishonest_assault_on_lgbtq_families.html

 

[Avenger]

That's f*cking disgusting. All Australians should be ashamed of ourselves that there are people that think this way in our country.

This is your team @Avenger, proud of that are you?

Of course I am. Also love what Pauline is doing and all the rednecks we represent.

#idiot

 

[ash411]

Of course I am. Also love what Pauline is doing and all the rednecks we represent.

#idiot

Name calling and sarcasm, that's a quality argument there, you must definitely be right.

Actually, to be fair, I'm not 100% sure it even is sarcasm, I know you're trying to make it sound like sarcasm, but as far as I know, from what you've said so far, that could be what you really think.

 

[Avenger]

Name calling and sarcasm, that's a quality argument there, you must definitely be right.

Actually, to be fair, I'm not 100% sure it even is sarcasm, I know you're trying to make it sound like sarcasm, but as far as I know, from what you've said so far, that could be what you really think.

Everytine I'm being sarcastic I'll post a rainbow flag that way you will not be confused. Deal?

 

[Bazal]

That's f*cking disgusting. All Australians should be ashamed of ourselves that there are people that think this way in our country.

This is your team @Avenger, proud of that are you?

It's not his team just because he's voting no.

I disagree with his stance but I also don't believe he is a hateful piece of shit like whoever is responsible for that abysmal effort.

 

[Gary Gutful]

It's not his team just because he's voting no.

I disagree with his stance but I also don't believe he is a hateful piece of shit like whoever is responsible for that abysmal effort.

+1

 

[Gronk]

x2.

Avenger said here that he was disgusted.

 

[Eelementary]

That's f*cking disgusting. All Australians should be ashamed of ourselves that there are people that think this way in our country.

This is your team @Avenger, proud of that are you?

My two cents - I think it's disgraceful that we have to have a vote to determine whether two gay people deserve the same basic rights that heterosexual couples receive.

Why it isn't automatically a given is beyond me - are gay people not real citizens?

Tbh, the Australian government disappoints me.

 

[Barry O'Speedwagon]

My two cents - I think it's disgraceful that we have to have a vote to determine whether two gay people deserve the same basic rights that homosrcual couples receive.

Why it isn't automatically a given is beyond me - are gay people not real citizens?

Tbh, the Australian government disappoints me.

It could be that homoscrual rights have been overstated

 

[Eelementary]

It could be that homoscrual rights have been overstated

I am not even sure how that autocorrected!

 

[Barry O'Speedwagon]

I am not even sure how that autocorrected!

It was the logical next step. First the Dark State moved into search engine optimisation, now they're paying the evil geniuses to manipulate the autocorrect function.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

This must be part of the sensible debate.

Well they have provided a source.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

By the way the "source" of the stats are flawed and the author is a Catholic priest

http://amp.slate.com/blogs/outward/...is_a_dishonest_assault_on_lgbtq_families.html

Ah, 'flawed' research hey? Don't you hate when social 'science' gets debunked. It's almost as though it's not real science at all.

 

[Gronk]

Well they have provided a source.

My brother's cat has a PHD too.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

My two cents - I think it's disgraceful that we have to have a vote to determine whether two gay people deserve the same basic rights that heterosexual couples receive.

Why it isn't automatically a given is beyond me - are gay people not real citizens?

Tbh, the Australian government disappoints me.

Because the existing law says that gay people can only marry members of the opposite sex, just like heterosexuals can.

Obviously changing the law is a big step, hence the vote.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

My brother's cat has a PHD too.

In gender studies, no doubt.

 

[Gronk]

Ah, 'flawed' research hey? Don't you hate when social 'science' gets debunked. It's almost as though it's not real science at all.

Peer reviewed research on SSM from the other priest PHD graduates from catholic universities?

Might as well get an EIS on Adani from a PHD merkin from the Coal University.

 

[Gronk]

In gender studies, no doubt.

Astrophysics

 

[Gronk]

Because the existing law says that gay people can only marry members of the opposite sex, just like heterosexuals can.

Obviously changing the law is a big step, hence the vote.

Survey.