Non Footy Chat Thread II

[ImTheMan]

Twizzle, have you ever wondered what it is like to harness no hate towards anyone? It is a great frame of mind to be in. I love my enemies just as much as I love all the people who like my posts. I am not a sycophant. I see value in every man and woman here whether they are a moderator or a new blow-in like me that is just looking to promote harmony and unity.

 

[Twizzle]

I dont hate any one princess and the only one who liked your posts is not here anymore

 

[ImTheMan]

I dont hate any one princess and the only one who liked your posts is not here anymore

I am glad to hear that Twizzle. I have no idea who you are referring to, there are plenty of people that have liked me. I am especially popular on the Cronulla forums, though I have many admirers here too. There are plenty of creatures in the woodwork you are not familiar with, but I am happy to introduce them to you some time.

 

[Twizzle]

I have many admirers here too

including yourself

 

[ImTheMan]

including yourself

??????????? Twizzle don't be like that, I love you like a brother.

 

[Twizzle]

sorry, not into incest

 

[ImTheMan]

sorry, not into incest

I always thought you were more of a twincest kind of guy tbh

 

[Gronk]

Only in America

 

[ImTheMan]

Only in America

 

[Gary Gutful]

Was Blades of Glory on?

I never found out whether it was on

 

[ImTheMan]

@Gronk's bookshelf at home:

 

[Bazal]

So it's only if they use a car to attack people? I don't remember your definition being that narrow. I believe it just said violence, regardless of the weapon or the severity of the effect. In fact it implied intimidation for political ends was enough, which certainly applies to large groups of people turning up with masks and weapons.

And to be honest I don't believe some random Muslim going on a rampage with a knife or a van is necessarily terrorism either. Unhinged merkins capable of wigging out and massacring people exist in all creeds, though when he's shouting Allahu Akbar it starts to look like he's sending a political message.

You wanted to make this about racism in America and the vehicle attack in Charlotte. You pulled out your trusty definition that very broadly states violence or intimidation for political ends is terrorism but then refuse to concede that plenty of Americans commit violence at heated political rallies. Why your fixation on the bloke with the car? Because he used a car? Or because he killed somebody? Neither are required to fit the definition of terrorism that YOU introduced to the discussion.

Lol. Classic. This is what you do, you tell people what they've said and mangle a little point so badly beyond recognition that it has almost nothing to do with what was originally said, then you pat yourself on the back for "teaching those merkins!"

Fisticuffs between opposing political groups is a fight. Maybe a riot on a decent scale. It isn't violence towards anyone, it's violence between someone. Fact is, you have actually yet to come up with any counter arguments to the original point. But that doesn't entirely surprise me.

It also has nothing to do with cars, you're probably quite aware that's just the very simple comparison I used between the "terrorist" in New York and the "protester" in Charlottesville who committed the exact same act and were labeled totally differently. But because Poupou can't argue that, Poupou creates a tangential circular argument involving Mexicans and short tempered lefties in an effort to confuse and exasperate. The MO is getting stale

 

[ImTheMan]

Lol. Classic. This is what you do, you tell people what they've said and mangle a little point so badly beyond recognition that it has almost nothing to do with what was originally said, then you pat yourself on the back for "teaching those merkins!"

Fisticuffs between opposing political groups is a fight. Maybe a riot on a decent scale. It isn't violence towards anyone, it's violence between someone. Fact is, you have actually yet to come up with any counter arguments to the original point. But that doesn't entirely surprise me.

It also has nothing to do with cars, you're probably quite aware that's just the very simple comparison I used between the "terrorist" in New York and the "protester" in Charlottesville who committed the exact same act and were labeled totally differently. But because Poupou can't argue that, Poupou creates a tangential circular argument involving Mexicans and short tempered lefties in an effort to confuse and exasperate. The MO is getting stale

lol classic Bazal. You are so sure of yourself and always try to turn everything into an argument of language and fallacies in order to never give an inch to anyone, because you are very in love with yourself. You never actually address what others have to say, it's like you don't even read what they are saying because you are so narcissistic. That's my psychological analysis and your "MO".

 

[strider]

I never found out whether it was on

Lets just say, if it had of been on you would have read about it

 

[Gary Gutful]

Lets just say, if it had of been on you would have read about it

True. He's a serious brewer now. He doesn't have time for dodgy movies.

 

[ImTheMan]

lol Do you know what would have been an easier way to self-indulge rather than posting 50, 000 messages to yourself pretending to actually engage with others? Having a wank. @Bazal

 

[Bazal]

True. He's a serious brewer now. He doesn't have time for dodgy movies.

Are you kidding? Serious brewers love dodgy movies. Probably because they spend all their time sampling the product

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Lol. Classic. This is what you do, you tell people what they've said and mangle a little point so badly beyond recognition that it has almost nothing to do with what was originally said, then you pat yourself on the back for "teaching those merkins!"

Fisticuffs between opposing political groups is a fight. Maybe a riot on a decent scale. It isn't violence towards anyone, it's violence between someone. Fact is, you have actually yet to come up with any counter arguments to the original point. But that doesn't entirely surprise me.

It also has nothing to do with cars, you're probably quite aware that's just the very simple comparison I used between the "terrorist" in New York and the "protester" in Charlottesville who committed the exact same act and were labeled totally differently. But because Poupou can't argue that, Poupou creates a tangential circular argument involving Mexicans and short tempered lefties in an effort to confuse and exasperate. The MO is getting stale

If you're confused and exasperated it's because you didn't think your argument through beforehand.

Losing your shit and running somebody over at a violent rally is no more terrorism than losing your shit and punching on at the same rally. It's no more terrorism than going to the rally in the first place with intent to intimidate merkins with opposing views.

But stick with the ad hominem attacks if your point is indefensible. *Because that's what you always do.* (See what I did there?)

 

[Gary Gutful]

*done

 

[ImTheMan]

Are you kidding? Serious brewers love dodgy movies. Probably because they spend all their time sampling the product