Barry O'Speedwagon
Coach
- Messages
- 19,397
INZY!!!
What has that fat prick got to do with it?
INZY!!!
It is very relevant. If they had form for politically motivated violence they would be called terrorists. Instead Mexican criminals in the US are mostly prosecuted for violent crimes linked to drugs and sex, not politics.And as I have already pointed out, they are persecuted in a different way based on years and years of entrenched xenophobia so the point is still irrelevant.
I five second Google search returns this from last year:When was the last act of violence perpetrated by a Mexican that qualifies for this discussion?
What everyone thinks matters, because this is a discussion about public opinion. If it was a legal discussion none of us would get a say.What you think doesn't matter.
Whose definition?The definition of terrorism qualifies both acts as the same.
According to that definition Antifa is also a terrorist organisation. BLM have allegedly committed terrorism as well, by that measure. Unless you think they have then you agree with me that the definition is too broad.Yet they are reported differently. That's the point, and the one you've deliberately ignored. Both are acts of terrorism. One is reported as such immediately, the other is played off.
Without xenophobia you wouldn't be here.Lol. It's nothing to do with moral high ground. The label matters because it's simply true. Call a spade a spade, in your own words. Plus it helps perpetuate the xenophobic attitudes that it comes from.
Only if you think all generalisations are stupid.and yet then you say
ironic isn't it
What has that fat prick got to do with it?
I'm za manWhat has that fat prick got to do with it?
It is very relevant. If they had form for politically motivated violence they would be called terrorists. Instead Mexican criminals in the US are mostly prosecuted for violent crimes linked to drugs and sex, not politics.
.
Sometimes when I am taking a shit, I get flashbacks of when you were relevant on these forums. Usually all I see is pitch black.Which is not terrorism.
You're usually less shit than this, tbh.
I don't think he was banned. Just reached 500 posts and signed off. I assume he's back to adjust for inflation.Oh, has Swifty's ban ended?
That's a shame.
I don't think he was banned. Just reached 500 posts and signed off. I assume he's back to adjust for inflation.
Loser, you are very observant and an underrated contributor to this forum. A quality human being and a man who knows how to have a good time. You can come around and hang in my corporate box whenever you want, just don't forget the whisky. CheersI don't think he was banned. Just reached 500 posts and signed off. I assume he's back to adjust for inflation.
My enormous cockLike financial inflation, or the inflation of ego?
and yet then you say
ironic isn't it
When I am shitting I am all business.Sometimes when I am taking a shit, I get flashbacks of when you were relevant on these forums. Usually all I see is pitch black.
My point was just that. Violence by Mexicans in America has never been politically motivated. So Americans don't call it terrorism.Which is not terrorism.
You're the one who is now cherry picking quotes from entire posts. I'll take the silence on the rest as point conceded.You're usually less shit than this, tbh.
So you agree that violence conducted by political organisations Antifa and BLM isn't necessarily terrorism? Or are you just really desperate to stick the boot into Trump voters?Well in the interest of setting you straight you'd be better off taking it as a point ignored. After all, if your argument is comparing Mexican gang violence to domestic or Islamic terrorism, and if what you get from that is that I'm "blaming America", then this is already rather deep into the territory where you inevitably drag all discussions and I half expect you to suddenly shout "change places"
So you agree that violence conducted by political organisations Antifa and BLM isn't necessarily terrorism? Or are you just really desperate to stick the boot into Trump voters?