Why didn’t he get a coaches clause put in then? Because he was happy with the 900k deal.
Ryan Webb (Dragons CEO) on the weekend saying Hunt won’t be released indicates there is no coaches clause, otherwise they would have no choice but to release him.
I suspect you have answered your own question. Dragons said no.
As far as I am aware Nathan Cleary is the only player with a clause like that and it was reported as being 'unprecedented' when it happened last year.
I can't imagine too many other circumstances where a club would say yes. It gives a players an enormous amount of power.
Who knows what assurances Hunt was given at the time regarding the tenure of Hook?
Anyway, I'm sure Hunt figured he could possibly get the same outcome if needed by doing what he is doing now, which you think is shit and I think is understandable, albeit unfortunate.