Sounds like social touch used to warm up and develop skills. So, not an actual sport then with formal rules and structured competition?
Yes. We used it as a warm up before training.
Sounds like social touch used to warm up and develop skills. So, not an actual sport then with formal rules and structured competition?
There you go again, you wanting something doesn't make it right. I've played and reffed Touch for about 25yrs now and have not heard a single person express any desire for the return of the markers. Everybody agrees it's a much better game without them.No I'm not! If it stops the repetitive tactic of trying to run defensive players offside then I'm no fan of the current rules in touch football.
Id rather see dummy half skills around the ruck being used to create space, not running people offside.
There you go again, you wanting something doesn't make it right. I've played and reffed Touch for about 25yrs now and have not heard a single person express any desire for the return of the markers. Everybody agrees it's a much better game without them.
But hell, I'm sure you know better with your experience reffing young children on the playground in Tippy League.
NRL would have been better spending its money doing this than giving touch millions of $'s just to have brand connection. End of day touch players are t likleymto watch nrl just because their footy has a nrl badge on it. Getting every pri sry school in the country playing leaguetag however would be massive for the sport. Link the clubs into it with some major nrl investment and we are going somewhere.
I'm aware of Oztag and there is provision in the Touch rule book for what are referred to as Park Rules, those used by local associations within the framework of Touch.
Whether what you are referring to fits in there, I couldn't say. The proof would be in their affiliation with parent bodies. Regardless, the NRL'S most important affiliation by far is with TFA.
Am I right in saying Touch Football wants to avoid too close of an association with the NRL because they feel like that would slow their growth?
Take it up with TFA.If park rules allow play the ball with the foot and a marker then 'park rules ' is the key. If this can be incorporated inti regular touch football comps then this would be a significant step forward for all concerned.
Am I right in saying Touch Football wants to avoid too close of an association with the NRL because they feel like that would slow their growth?
I spoke to NQTA supremo a couple of years ago and he detailed a cradle-to-grave strategy that came from the ARLC/NRL. Kids start with touch learning to pass, catch etc, parents can play with kids in the same team. Kids go on to play RL, learning to tackle etc, play until they retire then return to touch as they bring their own kids through. One of the key features of Touch is mixed teams, can’t think of another major sport that offers this, and that is an excellent option for female and family friendly inclusion.We certainly don't seem to gain much from the millions the nrl,is giving touch to be associated with it? I'm struggling to see what tangible benefits there are tbh. Someone mentioned govt grants due to inc touch numbers which may be one?
I spoke to NQTA supremo a couple of years ago and he detailed a cradle-to-grave strategy that came from the ARLC/NRL. Kids start with touch learning to pass, catch etc, parents can play with kids in the same team. Kids go on to play RL, learning to tackle etc, play until they retire then return to touch as they bring their own kids through. One of the key features of Touch is mixed teams, can’t think of another major sport that offers this, and that is an excellent option for female and family friendly inclusion.
Iirc, this was in Dave smith’s time, sounded pretty good at the time but haven’t seen much progress since then.
One of the key features of Touch is mixed teams, can’t think of another major sport that offers this, and that is an excellent option for female and family friendly inclusion.
I spoke to NQTA supremo a couple of years ago and he detailed a cradle-to-grave strategy that came from the ARLC/NRL. Kids start with touch learning to pass, catch etc, parents can play with kids in the same team. Kids go on to play RL, learning to tackle etc, play until they retire then return to touch as they bring their own kids through. One of the key features of Touch is mixed teams, can’t think of another major sport that offers this, and that is an excellent option for female and family friendly inclusion.
Iirc, this was in Dave smith’s time, sounded pretty good at the time but haven’t seen much progress since then.
I can't help but believe that Rugby League in the NH will overtake us down here unless we get serious about expansion in the not too distance future.
Toronto Wolfpack owner Eric Perez plans to launch two more American sides - BBC Sport