What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NRL faces major turmoil as clubs threaten breakaway league

DiegoNT

First Grade
Messages
9,378
Latest update - all 16 clubs have signed a letter indicating no confidence in John Grant and calling on him to resign.
That's pretty remarkable considering clubs like newcastle and GC are supposed to be under nrl control. Shows how bad Grant is
 

Lockyer4President!

First Grade
Messages
7,975
The NRL is never short of drama.

Can anyone copy the DT article?

ALL 16 NRL clubs have this afternoon issued an extraordinary vote of no-confidence in independent commission chairman John Grant and called on him to resign.

A letter addressed to the NRL, signed by all the chairmen and chairwomen, is to be emailed to chief executive Todd Greenberg and the commission, calling for an emergency meeting to vote on Grant’s future. He needs four votes to survive.

The clubs agreed on the unanimous vote of no confidence following the breakdown in talks yesterday when four chairmen stormed out of a meeting at NRL headquarters on future funding.

Even the clubs owned by the NRL — Newcastle and the Gold Coast Titans — have signed the letter.

So too have the Wests Tigers and St George Illawarra who have relied on NRL funding to survive in recent years.

Grant was in a commission meeting yesterday and unaware of the move by the clubs.
 

flamin

Juniors
Messages
2,046
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...e-club-funding-backtrack-20161124-gswga8.html

The clubs, the ARL and the NRL reached an in-principle agreement on the funding deal last December. Greenberg said on Thursday that neither he nor Grant had reneged on the agreement, but had told the clubs they would finalise the new collective bargaining agreement first before negotiating the new funding deal, which will distribute the record cash haul of the NRL's new $1.8 billion broadcast deal. He also foreshadowed changing priorities for the sport as the NRL battles falling participation numbers.

"I think what's happened is there's been some differing principles from last year to now and there are things you learn along the way. We were upfront with the clubs yesterday and we'll continue to be upfront with them," Greenberg said.

"The clubs are such an important part of the game, but also there are other parts of the game, including the grassroots. We've got some concerning trends on participation in the sport. We've got to make sure that in the next cycle we have a distribution model that allows us to invest in all parts to grow the sport."
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,547
so what happens here, do the clubs just no confidence vote every time things don't go their way? who's next on the merry go round?

Put its like in politics when the minority party passes a motion of no-confidence.

It doesn't actually mean much unless its supported by the required majority
 

Delboy

First Grade
Messages
7,501
Don't lose any sleep over this sort of thing, Major League Baseball and the NFL go through this every time they renegotiate. Currently the MLB owners and Players Assoc have until Dec 1 to agree or withdrawal of labour starts

A game of stare down

Having said that, Grant appears to be a dope with little vision or charisma. He should go and appoint someone who has some idea
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,456
Unless he caves he's gone.

Constitution provides two mechanisms to remove a director,

Simple majority of all 26 members (50% + 1) ie. 14 clubs

Or

Super majority 10 clubs + QRL + NSWRL

Either way Grant is f**ked.

I think clubs probably hope he caves and stays on, otherwise the commission will just appoint someone like Graeme Samuel as chairman and the clubs end up no better off.
 
Messages
60
I think clubs probably hope he caves and stays on, otherwise the commission will just appoint someone like Graeme Samuel as chairman and the clubs end up no better off.
this was more my point - so they go no f you and vote no confidence - grant resigns or is fired or whatever, another lackey comes in - what happens if they don't agree to the clubs demands? do they just vote no confidence everyone until they get their own way? it is a mind-bogglingly stupid game of chess with no winners.
 

GongPanther

Referee
Messages
28,676
Souths' Richardson has been rumored as one of the names to take our game well into the 21st century.

Maybe "Super League MKII"?
 

Latest posts

Top