Big_Bad_Shark_Fan said:no nutley
no kimmorley
=
no origin
ill be taking my wednesday evening tennis lessons and not attending this fake rep game. carlaw? give me a break
the selectors orta be ashamed of themselves. it wouldnt of suprised me if big jason stevens wasnt even picked even if he was available too the way these idiots work
schif4eva said:Why not just have the whole Sharks team as the state of origin team do u think that's a better idea BBSF?
He would probaly have Covell in every position.
Big_Bad_Shark_Fan said:give me a break
what the replays
it was raked
and oh btw, the whole team didnt perform, to single out 1 player is like picking a cow out of a barn full of cows
idiot
Covell had a crap game and you can't even admit it. The whole team played terribly - Covell most of all.
Big_Bad_Shark_Fan said:how do u no nutley isnt up to standard?
he carves up first grade every week?
when does carlaw do this? hardly ever
face the facts i am right
and yes peachey was robbed in 99
How biased could any one person (with multiple personalities) be ? You're right - what a laugh!
How do we know that Nutley isn't up to standard - perhaps because other people other than Sharks supporters might watch the game.
Why the '?' after 'he carves up first grade every week?' - are you questioning your own statement ?
Charlie Saab said:Apart from ET no other sharks players has played well in an origin game for NSW in he past 15yrs.
lazza said:yes u can say kimmorley did well for australia, but have you forgotten that that is the australian side and that no other country really comes close to australia. i mean if you put johns in the side instead of kimmorley, aust woulda won by a lot lot more.
you could put gower, orford in and they'd both do well
personally, i think origin is the closest battle in league ever and you cant compare nsw v qld against aust v the kiwis or brits, cos aust is just that far apart from them its not funny.
kimmorley needs a big fwd pack... means his a 1 dimensional player, ie he cant create for himself when pinned down.. i've seen lockyer, johns, the true greats get their teams outa a rut.. i never hear that johns or lockyer requiring a big forward pack for them to play well.
JJ said:Off the top of my head
Steve Rogers is a good place to start... (there are others from that era)
ET
Mark McGaw for NSW and Aust
Dan Stains was pretty useful in 89 for Qld
McKenna for Qld
Kimmorley for Aust
Jason Stevens for Aust
Gavin Miller
Matt Rogers
Les Davidson
***MH*** said:Why are NRL the joke when the NSWRL are doing the selecting?
lazza said:kimmorley needs a big fwd pack... means his a 1 dimensional player, ie he cant create for himself when pinned down.. i've seen lockyer, johns, the true greats get their teams outa a rut.. i never hear that johns or lockyer requiring a big forward pack for them to play well.
JJ said:i don't think that could have and should have arguments hold much water...
Bottom line is that Kimmorley has played well for Aust, and you're wrong - he was very good in the series when Aust were VERY understrength, so it;s not always that Aust jut has to turn up...
And if you haven't heard it before, every great half or 5/8 was/is much more effective behind a dominant forward pack - that is just as true of Johns and Lockyer as it is of Kimmorley, and was of Langer, Sterling, Mortimer and Stuart. That is perhaps even more true of Lockyer, as his defence is very questionable
Charlie Saab said:as one dimmesional as they come. Plays flat and thats it.
Nugby said:Having said that Charlie, when has Lockyer ever *not* had a big forward pack in front of him, not to put him down. Johns on the other hand has provde he can create miracles with less able forward packs