Slackboy72
Coach
- Messages
- 12,114
If you are going to use statistics use the right ones. The 3 capitals the NRL is in - Brisbane, Sydney, Canberra and Melboring - I make that 4.
I also not that Newcastle, Wollongong, Gold Coast and NQ - according to you - have zero contribution to League. Are you one of the dumb twits like the AFL who think Australia has only 5 postcodes???
For the sake of TV advertising revenue there are 8 'postcodes'.
Sydney
Melbourne
Brisbane
WA
Sth NSW
Nth NSW
Regional QLD
SA
Tas & NT don't matter. And compared to Syd (37% of national TV ad revenue), Melb (25%), Bris (17%) and Perth (~9%) the rest don't really matter either.
NRL wins 54% of the ad revenue market convincingly while AFL wins 34%.
NRL is earning roughly 60% more for whoever holds the rights than AFL rights ever could.
If AFL is worth $137m a year then NRL is worth $220m+.
Now lets redo the sums.
Assuming AFL players get 24%.
If the NRL were to match that currently that would be 400 players sharing in 24% of $343m ($127m TV and naming rights money plus $216m raised by the clubs) or roughly an average of $205,800.
Your salary cap would jump from $4.1m to $5.1m. Plenty to keep the marquee players from looking at Japan or France or wherever.
If the rights were sold for $220m i.e. if someone other than the owners of Fox Sports (PBL and Murdoch) were able to bid for them, then the average player payment leaps to $261,600. That's a $97,000 difference on average or after tax a THP boost from $112,000 to $166,000 or 48%.
If your boss could increase your take home pay by that much just by selling the product, that you are mainly responsible for producing, at market rates, WOULDN'T YOU WANT HIM TO?
If we could tell the mums and dads and kids of western Sydney that Rugby League players are the best paid footballers in Australia do you think they would pick up a Sherrin without looking at the Steeden?