kiwileaguefan
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,426
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12281838
Sorry can't copy the story on my phone.
Sorry can't copy the story on my phone.
Woha there is a bit of concern in this article for me:
"The Kiwis will play at least four tests next year, including a rare trip to Papua New Guinea.
Michael Maguire's team will also face the Kangaroos, though not necessarily in New Zealand, and have a highly anticipated rematch with Tonga.
It's also likely they will have a test against Samoa, if the right venue mix can be found with the other matches"
~~~
"It's likely the mid-year test against Tonga will be repeated at Mt Smart in 2020, building on the interest shown in the fixture last year.
In principle the Kangaroos are meant to cross the Tasman next year to face the Kiwis, but that game could be in either country, depending on how the financial equations stack up.
The prospect of an away test against the Kumuls is an intriguing one, as it used to be a regular fixture."
~~
Plans are also in place for the Kiwi Ferns to have games against Samoa and Australia.
The final verdict is still out on the Oceania Cup, with a disappointing crowd in Hamilton for Great Britain's clash with Tonga last week, but it is worth persevering with.
The event has been overshadowed in this country by the Rugby World Cup, but the concept has great merit."
~~~~~~~~~~
With the Oceanic Cup, New Zealand will need to play Fiji, not Samoa next year. Now ideally, they can just play both!
If New Zealand play PNG, Samoa could play maybe the Cook Islands as a warm up?
Abandoning the Oceanic Cup after one year would be peak rugby league.
But.
Is this because there is no Australian team to bankroll the matches? The part about 'Australian crossing the Tasman' being contingent on 'financial equations' - does anything rugby league in NZ make money that isn't with Tonga?
Creating the Oceanic Cup was peak rugby league.
Sticking with it, especially with the current format, would also be peak rugby league. Abandon all the good tournaments but stick with the shittiest 'tournament' they've ever created.
It'd be fine if build on it by adding a 4th team and a final.
Yes but then it's effectively a different concept. It's more a Pacific Four Nations than what they've intended this 'Oceanic Cup' to be.
Though I do agree. They do need to fit it in to the calendar suitably.
It definitely needs some tweaking. One part which hasn't received much talk yet is the fact that after the 2021 World Cup, it's highly likely that you'll never see both Australia and New Zealand in the tournament under its current format.
With the Oceania Cup to be played in the same years as the Americas, MEA and European Championships (2022 / 2024), based upon previous touring cycles / etc, its highly likely we'll have NZ touring Europe in 2022, and Australia back to Europe in 2024...
Now maybe those tour's won't matter... arguably NZ can leave their fixture against Australia at the end of the year as contractually required, and then play team 3 mid-year, but it still isn't ideal, as that then prevents any expansion of the tournament...
If it was mid year it would be perfect and could be done annually.Creating the Oceanic Cup was peak rugby league.
Sticking with it, especially with the current format, would also be peak rugby league. Abandon all the good tournaments but stick with the shittiest 'tournament' they've ever created.
It would be good to see PNG hosting a tier 1 every year. Same with France.
It's easy to get caught up in the hype of Tonga but these 2 nations in particular are probably still the only others outside the tier 1s that can draw a good 15k+ crowd and produce plenty of players.
I have hopes for Fiji, not sure about crowds though