El Diablo
Post Whore
- Messages
- 94,107
Pretty sure I live in a house actually. I don't think it is possible to live inside a webpage.
Regardless of where I live you're still a shit moderator who should keep posts on topic. Not take it off topic
Pretty sure I live in a house actually. I don't think it is possible to live inside a webpage.
Regardless of where I live you're still a shit moderator who should keep posts on topic. Not take it off topic
At least a premiership in 2013 is something Tigpies don't need to concern themselves with
Former Cronulla player Isaac Gordon is pursuing legal action against the club, revealing he was told by the Sharks doctor he might have died as a result of the side-effects of the substance he was given at the club.
Gordon, who was at the Sharks in 2011 when sports scientist Stephen Dank ran a supplements program, is seeking compensation after suffering a mysterious blood-thinning disorder that left him with severe bruising from the ankle to the groin of one leg that was tested for cancer, and wants those responsible to be held accountable.
The 26-year-old, who also revealed that he had met ASADA officials in his Gladstone home in April, was informed by then club doctor David Givney after suffering a cork in the round 10 game against the Sydney Roosters in 2011 that his blood ''was so thin that if I had copped a knock to the head I could've died on the field''.
It came on the day trainer Mark Noakes was reinstated, with Givney and physiotherapist Konrad Schultz invited to reapply for their jobs next year - all innocent parties according to Gordon.
James Chrara, NSW general manager of Shine Lawyers, is investigating Gordon's claim, and believes the club has done wrong by the players by not encouraging them to seek independent legal advice from the outset.
Chrara also has concerns for the health and welfare of the former Sharks winger, who he believes was treated as a ''guinea pig''.
''When he queried what he was directed to take, he was told, 'Don't worry about, it's just for your recovery,''' Chrara said. ''The fact they said that, in particular the people responsible for providing the supplements, would mean the direction to take those substances was intentional by them, and they can be held liable for intentional trespass to person if indeed they are found to be illegal.
''He had severe bruising all over his leg, it also affected his stomach lining and the level of blood thinning he had in his system. His pathology results revealed there were significant imbalances in his blood. So he and his family are concerned about the long-term consequences. He's suffered physically and emotionally since then and still is.''
The supplements in question were taken by Gordon as lozenges, drinks and creams, and he was also given a vial with the label ''for equine use only'' and ''not for human consumption'' to be taken orally each morning and night.
Concerned by what he was given to take by a former employee of the club, Gordon brought the vial to Givney, and that was believed to be the catalyst for Dank's departure from the Sharks after his 11 weeks.
''I'm happy the Sharks have apologised to the staff that were sacked earlier in the year, especially to Doc Givney, because they were all scapegoats,'' Gordon said. ''But I'm still concerned those responsible for the implementation of the supplement program still haven't been held to account.''
Chrara has also expressed serious concerns with the advice the players received from Cronulla, of the opinion there would be clear conflict of interest if the representations made to Gordon were indicative of the advice the players were receiving from the club.
''The club has known about this for seven months, and the players should have been advised long ago to seek independent legal advice as to their rights and entitlements,'' Chrara said.
''As soon as it was apparent there were potential legal entitlements for the players to pursue against the club, the players should have been advised to seek independent legal advice. We believe there's obvious conflicts occurring among the club, coaching staff and the players and what they've been told.
''Isaac was told any attempt [to gain compensation] would be futile because if he did bring proceedings against the club, the club would file for bankruptcy. He was discouraged to do so. We're also concerned about the breaches of fiduciary duties and conflicts of interest in relation to this whole saga.''
When Gordon, who was told the bruising he suffered was something only seen on a 90-year-old woman, met ASADA officials in April, he revealed every supplement he was given at the club and who was involved.
Gordon's parents are also furious with the club's treatment of their son, and are demanding answers from the Sharks.
''Isaac's family are concerned with his welfare and the long term consequences of all the stuff that he took,'' Chrara said.
''His parents were assured by the club that as a young player coming into the city from the bush, they would take care of his interests and be appropriate guardians for him. They feel that they breached that trust and have been betrayed by the club because they failed in that obligation.''
If true.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...-banned-peptides/story-fni3gol8-1226687783123As Noakes was on Monday given his job back after being sacked in March, The Daily Telegraph obtained a copy of his written statement that was provided to the club's independent investigation earlier this year.
In a stunning development, the statement names the substances - GHRP-6 and CJC-1295 - as those players were taking over an 11-week period in 2011.
It also claims:
* PLAYERS were given peptides without the knowledge of former club doctor David Givney.
* FORMER strength and conditioning coach Trent Elkin had his own blood tested prior to the program being implemented.
* A BELIEF that the peptides were approved for use in 2011 and then banned the following year.
The club's anti-doping officer at the time, Noakes provided his statement to Dr Tricia Kavanagh - who led the independent investigation - on February 13.
He contacted ASADA on the same day to check the status of both peptides, but could not state with certainty whether or not they were approved in 2011.
ASADA has since confirmed that both GHRP-6 and CJC-1295 have been banned at all times, because they promote growth hormone production.
Under a subtitle "Facts without Proof" at the bottom of the statement, Noakes declared: "The substances that the players were taking GHRP-6 and CJC-1295 were apparently legal to take in 2011 but have since been banned from 2012. However, there was no hard copy documentation stating that in 2011 this was the case. I have called ASADA today February 13 and spoke with Jeff from Athletes Department and he is checking up on this information for me."
In the same sub-section - "Facts without Proof" - Noakes also alleges that Elkin reported "negative" results after having his own blood tested.
Now at Parramatta, Elkin has previously denied "self-administration" of any peptides.
Noakes spoke out in support of Elkin, but refrained from making a character assessment of sports scientist Stephen Dank, who devised and oversaw the supplement program, because he didn't know him well.
Elkin and Dank have denied any wrongdoing.
"Trent had his own blood tested prior to anyone starting a supplement program and he informed me that all tests came back negative," the statement reads.
"Whilst I don't know Steve Dank that well, I feel/felt I know Trent's integrity and he would never knowing allow any professional athlete to take ... any banned substances."
The remainder of Noakes' statement provides a chronology of Dank's program of injections, tablets and creams, which ended after round 12.
Noakes claimed there were three rounds of injections.
But he didn't become aware of needles being used until he was asked to bring a sharps container to training during the second round of jabs on March 25, 2011.
The statement claims the injections stopped on March 28 or 29, just prior to the team's round four clash against New Zealand in Taupo.
"To the best of my knowledge the injections stopped after this due to player and club doctor concerns, (this was the first time I think that the club doctor found out about the injections) but then players were given a tablet/lolly that they placed in there (sic) mouth under there (sic) tongue where this substance dissolved," the statement reads.
Noakes said the peptide creams were introduced in rounds five or six, and continued until Dank's departure without Dr Givney's knowledge.
"Some players, not all, still use the cream (applied to there (sic) arms or leg), without club doctor knowledge, still always believing there is nothing illegal about this method," the statement reads.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/n...sharks-apologies/story-fni3gokz-1226687787298In regular dialogue with Sharks decision makers, NRL chief executive Dave Smith expressed trepidation about overturning the decision before the current ASADA investigation is completed.
Smith was nervous because he possessed the written statement Noakes had tendered to the independent investigation, which has been revealed by The Daily Telegraph. The statement names banned peptides GHRP-6 and CJC-1295 as the substances that Noakes, the club's anti-doping officer at the time, claimed were being used in 2011.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/n...sharks-apologies/story-fni3gokz-1226687787298EXCLUSIVE: CRONULLA CEO Bruno Cullen quit in disgust Monday night over the board's decision to reappoint trainer Mark Noakes, who has claimed that players were injected with peptides in 2011. NEEDLES AND THE NOAKES FILE
NRL NERVOUS OVER SHARKS' APOLOGIES
PHIL ROTHFIELD: LET'S PUT THE INVESTIGATION ON HOLD
In a written statement that was given to Cronulla's independent investigation on February 13, Noakes named GHRP-6 and CJC-1295 as the substances used throughout the club's 2011 supplement program.
The statement - and the fact Noakes was Cronulla's anti-doping officer - raised concerns from the NRL, Cullen and other Sharks figures about any plans to reappoint him.
But the club's board nevertheless overturned the decision of their predecessors to sack Noakes in March, along with football manager Darren Mooney, veteran doctor David Givney and physiotherapist Konrad Schultz.
All four dismissed staff were also given a "full apology" Monday, with Givney and Schultz invited to reapply for their old jobs next season.
Consideration is also being given to re-instating Mooney.
The NRL parachuted Cullen into the Sharks as interim CEO on the same day Noakes, Mooney, Givney and Schultz were sacked.
Speaking Monday night, the former Brisbane Broncos boss said no senior management - including football operations head Steve Noyce - were consulted about the decision to reinstate Noakes.
"I can't comment on the reinstatement because I was not party to any information, any evidence or the grounds on which the investigation came to a conclusion," Cullen said.
"Neither was (Noyce) or the company secretary.
"This is all about governance and there were no instructions from the board at all on what grounds they were reinstating Noakes."
Geez that Isaac Gordon article makes things interesting.
.eez that Isaac Gordon article makes things interesting
Geez that Isaac Gordon article makes things interesting.
It's not always about you.Regardless of everything else, I don't understand why the players were not told to look at getting independent advice. Even a genius could see that basic good business practice suggests that is something that should have happened.