The Manly Warringah Sea Eagles have been told by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) that none of the Clubs players, past or present, have tested positive to illegal performance enhancing substances.
Sea Eagles officials, including Club chairman Scott Penn and General Manager Dave Perry attended a meeting today with ASADA and Tony Whitlam QC, who heads the new NRL integrity unit.
ASADA outlined to Manly and five other NRL clubs the processes it is undertaking as part of its on-going investigation into the use of banned substances in Australian sport, Mr Perry said.
We will continue to assist ASADA in its investigation.
Confidentiality precludes the Sea Eagles from discussing details of that investigation.
Mr Perry said that Manly had waited until 9.30am today to announce publicly it was named in the Australian Crime Commission report to ensure Mr Penn could brief the full playing squad.
We thought it only fair that the players be briefed by the Club Chairman before talking to the media, Mr Perry said.
Again I must emphasise the Sea Eagles condemn unreservedly any use of illegal performance-enhancing substances by players.
http://www.seaeagles.com.au/news-display/Sea-Eagles-statement-after-ASADA-meeting/68291
While it doesn't clear the club, it certainly reinforces the position of the club that We are unaware of any use of illegal performance enhancing substances by any member of the Sea Eagles squad.
http://www.seaeagles.com.au/news-di...nue-to-cooperate-with-ACC-investigation/68233
In another report... Perry said the Sea Eagles had also been told the club was a
"low to medium risk'' in relation to the severity of their involvement in the investigation into the use of performance-enhancing drugs
http://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/ph...-of-accs-mention/story-fndujljl-1226575884763
If this is the status of all the other NRL clubs, the press release of the 'blackest day in Australian sport' is an epic failure aimed purely at trying to flush out a culture they suspect is there. To be able to categories a risk in such a manor (low to medium) surely means the evidence is fairly flimsy at best. Perhaps based purely on Heresay evidence which is completely inadmissable anyway.
I still find the whole situation a little concerning that the testing has not found anything at any club, yet apparently there is a major issue. Surely that is a massive failure on the part of the testing and the governing body if there is infact a massive culture of doping in the sport. Surely that is the location we need massive reforms.
I hate drugs in sport, and I don't condone the use under any circumstances. I'd like to think the testing can be improved to catch offenders in the future and strip them of their success when the methods they use can be exposed. Right now it appears Dank has a very strong case for defamation.