What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Organised crime and ElephantJuice in sport investigation part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

Parra

Referee
Messages
24,900
Has Jason Clare backed up the organised crime claim yet?

Do we have the list of fixed matches?
 

Pig Champion

Juniors
Messages
1,904
I only want to see one of 2 results come of this:

1) Sharks are kicked out (the obvious choice)

2) SHarks are found to be totally innocent and therefore can claim damages, a public apology, ect... (I mean, this is just shitting all over the clubs image)

3) You are a Kharnt (the obvious choice)
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...ndings-next-week/story-fni3gol8-1227026057928

Cronulla finally face the end of long journey, with ASADA to present its findings next week

Josh Massoud
The Daily Telegraph
August 16, 2014 12:00AM

PAST and present Cronulla players implicated in the ASADA probe were expecting to know their fates this week — until the anti-doping watchdog pulled out of a meeting called by the NRL.

Lawyers representing more than 20 members of Cronulla’s 2011 squad were recently made aware of the NRL’s desire to have the long-running saga put to bed before the start of next season.

Following secret discussions with ASADA about possible penalties and suspensions, the NRL wanted to call all players and support staff implicated to a meeting this week.

However, it was called-off after ASADA claimed it needed more time to prepare — an indication that show cause notices are in the works.

The meeting has now been held over until next week, although sources close to the investigation said a date is yet to be determined. Attendance is not compulsory.

ASADA has spent the past 18 months preparing a case against the club, which is suspected of conducting a systemic regime of injections, creams and pills over an 11-week period in 2011. ASADA suspects banned peptides CJC — 1295 and GHRP-6 were given to players during that time.

Use of those substances — prohibited under the WADA code — normally carries a two-year suspension.

However, the NRL’s ideal outcome is for all parties to negotiate six-month bans, meaning the code will finally be free of the scandal when the new season begins next March.

With just seven months between now and then, the NRL needs a quick resolution — hence its desire to call the meeting as soon as possible. Hence the very real possibility that show cause notices could be handed down as soon as next week.

For Cronulla, the potential bans are nowhere near as devastating as 18 months ago, when the scandal first erupted. Then, the Sharks had 10 active players in the firing line. Now they only have four: Paul Gallen, Wade Graham, Anthony Tupou and Nathan Gardner.

Five have moved to rival clubs in the past year: Jayson Bukuya (Warriors), Nathan Stapleton (Roosters), Ben Pomeroy (Catalans), Matthew Wright (Cowboys) and Stewart Mills (Broncos). The only other survivor from 2011 — hooker John Morris — announced his retirement this week.

Players who moved to other clubs prior to the ASADA probe commencing have also been invited to attend. They include Titans pair Luke Douglas and Albert Kelly, and Knights duo Jeremy Smith and Kade Snowden. All remaining members of the 2011 squad have either retired, or are playing overseas, or in England.

The entire group is represented by a range of different lawyers, with Gallen splitting from his current teammates midway through last year to hire his own crack legal team.

The players have consistently denied any wrongdoing.

Even if a six-month suspension over the off-season is negotiated, Gallen would stand to lose the most. He’s a certainty in Australia’s Four Nations squad, and has also been negotiating up to three pro boxing fights during the summer.
 
Messages
4,980
As much as I think the Sharks players are more likely to have "innocently" doped (because of a Danks), rather than having doped on purpose to cheat, I don't see how the players can expect to receive the 75% penalty reduction for "substantial assistance", when the players appear to have thumbed their noses at ASADA the whole way along.

Can bans be served during the off season? Doesn't make much sense really.
 

Foz

Bench
Messages
4,124
As much as I think the Sharks players are more likely to have "innocently" doped (because of a Danks), rather than having doped on purpose to cheat, I don't see how the players can expect to receive the 75% penalty reduction for "substantial assistance", when the players appear to have thumbed their noses at ASADA the whole way along.

Can bans be served during the off season? Doesn't make much sense really.
Just wondering if you knew when ASADA actually attempted to make contact with the Sharks players last?
It's interesting as the only public showing of a thumbing the noses action by the Sharks players that I can remember at the beginning of the investigation when Wade had to go to a so called private interview and the media tracked him down and then criticised him for the way he was dressed.
Honestly can't remember any other incident.Remember it's not up to the Sharks players to contact ASADA unless they ask them to.
They were interviewed but who knows if they were assisting or not?
Maybe the clowns from the paper were there.
They think they know everything.
 
Last edited:

Wizardman

First Grade
Messages
9,346
Blackest darkest something something no-one gives a shit anymore.

The exact vibe I got from the investigation. I get the feeling that Essendon were easier to pin down as they were (ironically) more professional with keeping records than Cronulla.
 

BuffaloRules

Coach
Messages
15,593
The exact vibe I got from the investigation. I get the feeling that Essendon were easier to pin down as they were (ironically) more professional with keeping records than Cronulla.

Did they keep records?

I thought the problem was that they co- operated with ASADA as the AFL gave them a wink that everything would be fine.
 
Messages
4,980
Imagine if it were the Roosters or Dogs getting this kind of sweetheart deal. The forum would be in meltdown. Same if the Bombers had been given the same deal.

Drugs cheats shouldn't be able to walk away with such light penalties.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top