Card Shark
Immortal
- Messages
- 32,237
f**k up Fahey to wherever you went to.
ASADA stance on Earl hands the ball back to Cronulla players
Date
August 31, 2013
Brad Walter, Michael Carayannis
Cronulla players who used the growth hormone releasing peptide CJC-1295 face two-year bans unless they come forward and give evidence about the supplements program at the club in 2011.
The infraction notice issued to Canberra winger Sandor Earl on Thursday leaves no doubt the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency has determined CJC-1295 was banned at the time Sharks players allegedly used it, while also indicating none of them admitted using a prohibited substance during interviews which finished last week.
Fairfax Media has been told one Cronulla player had considered seeking a six-month suspension for providing ''substantial assistance'' earlier this year before being talked out of it, but the swiftness with which the NRL and ASADA acted against Earl suggests no other player has confessed to a doping violation.
Earl is understood to have been interviewed for a fourth time on Tuesday and a decision made to charge him the following day because he had confessed to using and trafficking CJC-1295 and other prohibited substances after evidence understood to be text messages and credit card receipts were shown to him.
Without an admission from a player, ASADA's anti-doping rule violation panel would have to approve the issuing of an infraction notice and that would be a much lengthier process.
However, players who do not admit any guilt are unable to seek a 75 per cent discount for providing ''substantial assistance'' and if found guilty the only other avenue for a reduced ban open to the 10 current Cronulla players and four ex-Sharks believed to have been interviewed over the alleged use of CJC-1295 and another peptide GHRP-6 at the club in early 2011 would be to claim ''no significant fault or negligence''. To do so they would need to prove they were unaware they had taken any banned substances and may have the mandatory two-year ban under the WADA code reduced by half.
While CJC-1295 - which an internal Cronulla report identified as one of the substances given to players - did not appear on WADA's list of prohibited substances until September 2011, the fact Earl was charged with using it in August 2011 dispels any notion that it was legal when the Sharks allegedly used it up to May 29, 2011.
According to ASADA, CJC-1295 is covered under S.2 of the WADA prohibited list, which states it is illegal for athletes to take any product that promotes growth hormone.
The use of a prohibited substance carries a mandatory two-year ban, while athletes found guilty of trafficking face a minimum four-year ban with a potential life ban from all sports signed up to the WADA code.
Earl might be an isolated case and not linked to any other professional rugby league player but his impending ban is potentially significant for other players of interest.
It is understood that interviews between ASADA and the 31 rugby league players are set to conclude early next week with only a handful of players remaining.
Sharks players who have completed their interviews still have an opportunity to come forward and provide some or more assistance to ASADA. But former ASADA chief executive Richard Ings warned the longer players waited, the smaller the opportunity for leniency.
"If any player at another club has used performance-enhancing ElephantJuice they are well advised to come forward and disclose that to authorities, rather than waiting for a knock on the door and receiving the maximum penalty," Ings said.
sandrep would of had no case to answer if he went on live tv and confessed to taking banned Wada drug like that Essendon captain
Well under their guidelines they say anything that affects growth hormones is a banned substance but AOD 9604 is an amino acid chain which mimics a growth hormone so there is a bit of obscurity over WADA's guidelines. But obviously WADA are having none of it. It was stupid of Essedon to use it in the first place but they can't be blamed for maybe believing it was legal.I'm surprised Essendon keep peddling the aod 6904isn't a problem thread when wada have clearly stated it is and always has been a banned substance?
The old 'no it's not' defence.When the Essendon sanctions were announced this week, club chairman Paul Little said of AOD-9604: ''We don't accept that it was a prohibited substance during 2012.''
The old 'no it's not' defence.
Works every time.
sandrep would of had no case to answer if he went on live tv and confessed to taking banned Wada drug like that Essendon captain
Earl team working towards discount
Date
September 7, 2013
Adrian Proszenko
Chief Rugby League Reporter
Sandor Earl's legal representative met with Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority and NRL officials on Thursday to determine what more is required from the Canberra winger in order to resume his career next season.
Earl is facing the prospect of a four-year ban for doping offences during his time at Penrith in 2011. He last week became the first player issued with an infraction notice, for the use and trafficking of performance-enhancing drug CJC-1295.
The 23-year-old has denied providing banned substances to NRL players and hopes to gain a 75 per cent reduction on his ban for providing ''substantial assistance'' to ASADA. What that entails was discussed on Thursday.
''ASADA has outlined to him what they require Sandor to do to avail himself of the substantial-assistance provision,'' lawyer Tim Unsworth said. ''We're working towards that.''
Advertisement
It was initially reported there would be a 10-day time frame for the matter to be concluded, but Unsworth said it was likely to take a fortnight to determine whether his client will contest the matter or not. It's understood ASADA is unlikely to grant a discount if Earl fights the charge.
Earl provided information to ASADA about sports scientist Stephen Dank, who referred him to Dr Ijaz Khan to treat his shoulder injuries. Dank has maintained he never provided athletes with banned substances.
Dr Khan, who earned bachelor of medicine and surgery qualifications at Flinders University, continues to practice at his Injury Care clinic in Cabramatta.
''There is no actual [10-day] time frame. We're still working through the process,'' Unsworth said. ''They haven't asked him to indicate whether he will contest the matter or not.''
Trafficking cases could hit NRL finals
by: Brent Read and Margie Mcdonald
From: The Australian
September 07, 2013 12:00AM
THE trafficking charge against suspended Canberra winger Sandor Earl has given rise to suggestions similar charges may be laid against players under suspicion for using banned substances outside the realm of their clubs.
Earl is facing a four-year ban after becoming the first athlete from either of the major codes to be charged in relation to the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority investigation.
Surprisingly, he was hit with a trafficking charge, meaning under the provisions of the World Anti-Doping Agency code he was involved in the selling, giving, transporting, sending, delivering or distributing of a prohibited substance by an athlete or any other person to any third party.
Crucially, it is understood text messages obtained by ASADA played a part in the case against Earl. They could yet give rise to more charges as ASADA explores the option of catching players under the trafficking clause.
Digital Pass $1
While text messages in the possession of ASADA may not necessarily implicate players in taking banned substances, it is understood they could confirm the suspicion that players were involved in transporting them to venues outside their clubs.
That could leave players open to trafficking charges. The Weekend Australian was told further infraction notices could be issued within a fortnight, raising the possibility that the game's finals series could be interrupted by the ASADA investigation.
It had been thought that infraction notices were more likely to fall in mid-October or later, endangering the World Cup.
So I'm guessing this all goes away now, being a Labor conspiracy and all.
Or, anything that happens from this point on is AOK with El D and co., and stinks to high heaven to M4E. I mean you have to toe the party line, whatever it be, yeah?
Why bring me into it