Miller was a legend
Coach
- Messages
- 17,542
The death rider is in full force today
What's ludicrous? That a sportsman gets a mandatory 2 years for whereabouts issues regardless of excuse, or that there is a deal struck when players have been subjected to 18 months of public mudraking on the basis of a pizzweak, unprovable case?
Just because the profile of the nrl miraculously resulted in a semi sensible outcome from a power mad, previously unaccountable entity don't get the shits at the nrl.
these players were administered with peptides that weren't on the banned list in 2011
What do you mean.... a suspended sentence from a court of law?
This is just sport and the Sharks players haven't got any kind of custodial sentence, suspended or not. There is no loss of freedom, no need to report to police, no ankle bracelet. They haven't been charged with breaking any laws. The vast majority of society don't give a toss about them or the game or what they took or who gave it to them. They've just been suspended from work for a few weeks because they have broken the rules. There is no need to drag society into the strange workings of the Sharks footy team.
Fact is the players have just done what most crims do when they get caught, not that they are crims. They got caught and either shifted the blame or claimed stupidity in the hope it would get them a smaller punishment. It worked and many people think that's great. I think it has the potential to ruin pro sport since every athlete in the world now has a precedent to avoid any real punishment. But it's only sport so it doesn't really matter.
Fact is if they were Olympians they'd be coming to the end of a two year ban at least.
Wake up.
The problem is with those giving and taking the supplements not ASADA.
The fact that ASADA hasn't given those bans means there's been political manouvering behind the scenes.
The deals are a disgrace and serve as a warning to no one. In fact they show if you do drugs there'll be clowns to support you against the Nazi ASADA regime.
The fact that ASADA hasn't given those bans means there's been political manouvering behind the scenes.
100 percent wrong. I prefer the innocent until proven guilty model. The fact that Asada hasn't given bans is because they don't have the required evidence. But rather than not lay charges in those circumstances, they concoct a dodgy deal to save face. So we agree the deals are a disgrace.
You don't know that.
Are you saying no one was involved with banned substances?
And you know this for fact? If there was no evidence I can assure you there would be no show causes issued. Players don't have to knowingly take something, it is very clear the onus is on them to know what they are taking. My sense is there was evidence but asada screwed up, or where after bigger fish, and the delay in charging the players means they are open to being contested so took the soft option of making the punishment so pss weak that players would accept it.
As for they didn't know, that is simply not an excuse. You keep asking would I ask what my Dr was giving me, if my entire career was reliant on it you bet I would.
Apart from the reports that the players were told "don't tell the Doc". If there is any truth to that, then the players certainly do have to wear at least some responsibility.
What part of the innocent until proven guilty model do you struggle with?
Are you saying no one was involved with banned substances?
Come on. If ASADA had absolutely anything substantial there's no way they'd be offering these tiny 3 match bans.
From everything that's come to light it seems the only thing the players are guilty of is naively trusting the poor advice from coaching staff.
Right.... So you don't understand the whole innocent until proven guilt thing. Ok
Which gets you a ban in professional sport even if you weren't aware of it
Head coach and trainer haven't copped enough
The death rider is in full force today