OT: Association Football

[Poupou Escobar]

Sounds like complaining to me. If you're going to troll at least own it.

 

[Suitman]

If thin-skinned merkins throw tantrums about being shown up, why should I care?

You continually prove that you care by replying.
You COULD just choose to ignore it?

 

[phantom eel]

Huh? My three word assessment of a linked article doesn't mean that I care about your subsequent essay about your take on the linked article, and the questions you chose to pose for me.

Your overblown responses to simple opinions like "a good article" show a different level of "caring", to the point of obsession? I might care about showing you up for a laugh, but only after you've erroneously called me out in your posts and made misguided accusations of trolling.

You can control your addiction, and stop directing your posts at me (and hence creating your own stomach ulcers). I believe in you.

 

[phantom eel]

Sounds like complaining to me. If you're going to troll at least own it.

Haha, being accused of trolling when I haven't tried is laughable.

If I was trying to troll you'd know about it!

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Well we all know about it. Hence your treatment in this thread. You are a known troll, and yet you are feigning perplexity at the way people respond to you.

 

[phantom eel]

Lol... my "treatment".

Like being wanked off by two gimps using wet lettuce leaves as gloves?

 

[phantom eel]

 

[Suitman]

FFS

 

[eels81236]

How's your Sunday been, Bart? I play off 18 and had 18 stableford points at Warringah ffs. I still reckon I had a better day than you arguing over nothing with an internet persona.

 

[phantom eel]

My Sunday was great thanks. I worked on a range of projects and checked in here for the occasional laugh. Golf isn't my thing, but I'm glad you had a good round.

Still, I reckon I had a better Sunday than two certain people who seem obsessed with my internet persona(s), and kept posting comments and questions to me here... lol.

 

[phantom eel]

yet you are feigning perplexity at the way people respond to you.

There is no perplexity involved. I post three words about an article. Someone with apparent obsession issues posts an overblown essay back, gets upset that I didn't respond to his questions within, and is still having a cry about it (and Wanderers equality, lol) a day later.

 

[Suitman]

At risk of being accused of being a troll *roll eyes emoticon*, that's a good article.

It was actually 16 words.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

My Sunday was great thanks. I worked on a range of projects and checked in here for the occasional laugh. Golf isn't my thing, but I'm glad you had a good round.

Still, I reckon I had a better Sunday than two certain people who seem obsessed with my internet persona(s), and kept posting comments and questions to me here... lol.

Why are you so obsessed over a couple of internet personas taking you to task? If you don't care you should be able to let go.

 

[phantom eel]

It was actually 16 words.

Sure, but thirteen of the words were merely predicting the risk of your overblown paranoid antics in response to what would otherwise have been just three words of context ("a good article").

Hope you're pleased with yourself there. But I know you can overcome your obsession. You can stop quoting me in your posts, you can stop referring to me in your posts, you can stop asking me questions in your posts. I believe in you...

 

[phantom eel]

Why are you so obsessed over a couple of internet personas taking you to task? If you don't care you should be able to let go.

Why are those two internet personas so obsessed in "taking me to task" (lol)?

This is going around in circles gents, and it's not a deep philosophical argument discovering new ground by any means. So I'll ask you the question that Suity refuses to answer - what is really about for you Pou? Why do you really care about whether someone (who is not you) answers an essay of questions by someone else (who is also not you) on the internet?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

There is no perplexity involved. I post three words about an article. Someone with apparent obsession issues posts an overblown essay back, gets upset that I didn't respond to his questions within, and is still having a cry about it (and Wanderers equality, lol) a day later.

Actually you didn't clarify why you thought it was good. I don't like the Wanderers and I thought it was a shitty and terribly biased article. It seemed like little more than a media troll, much like the articles about Parra when we're down.

The fact you felt the need to share how good you thought the article was shows again that you're a troll. You're smarter than to actually think that article was actually any good. But you were very quick to share your 'opinion' with us.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Why are those two internet personas so obsessed in "taking me to task" (lol)?

This is going around in circles gents, and it's not a deep philosophical argument discovering new ground by any means. So I'll ask you the question that Suity refuses to answer - what is really about for you Pou? Why do you really care about whether someone (who is not you) answers an essay of questions by someone else (who is also not you) on the internet?

I just like seeing trolls and other bullies get their comeuppance.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Sure, but thirteen of the words were merely predicting the risk of your overblown paranoid antics in response to what would otherwise have been just three words of context ("a good article").

Hope you're pleased with yourself there. But I know you can overcome your obsession. You can stop quoting me in your posts, you can stop referring to me in your posts, you can stop asking me questions in your posts. I believe in you...

Sounds like you're begging someone to put you on ignore.

 

[phantom eel]

Actually you didn't clarify why you thought it was good.

True, but do I have to? What if it was simply my "gut feel"?

The fact you felt the need to share how good you thought the article was shows again that you're a troll.

Um... no it doesn't. You should check your logic there. It's subject to a false assumption.

I don't like the Wanderers and I thought it was a shitty and terribly biased article. It seemed like little more than a media troll, much like the articles about Parra when we're down.

Fair enough. Thanks for sharing your opinion in a concise form, aiding discussion (rather than overblown and too long to read).

You're smarter than to actually think that article was actually any good. But you were very quick to share your 'opinion' with us.

I didn't think I was that quick... I read the article, and then posted a comment (guessing some thin-skinned merkins would overreact, even though I barely said anything) and I moved on. Only to find some merkins still upset about three (non-trolling) words, lol.

 

[phantom eel]

I just like seeing trolls and other bullies get their comeuppance.

Well, stay tuned - I'll beat them yet!

Sounds like you're begging someone to put you on ignore.

For his own mental health, I reckon it'd be a good step... but begging, lol, no. Dealing with strangely obsessed merkins on the internet is just sport for me, something I put up with for a laugh or two while I'm stuck at a computer doing something else.