What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OT: Current Affairs and Politics

strider

Post Whore
Messages
79,089
Alot of places seem very gas and nuclear dependent .... Thats a bit sucky yeah?

What is australias break down per source?
 

Bandwagon

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
45,908
Alot of places seem very gas and nuclear dependent .... Thats a bit sucky yeah?

What is australias break down per source?

Obviously that's a coulpa years old, so when you look at the growth of renewables it's gonna be a higher percentage this year and last. But still it's predominately coal.
 

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
53,228

Obviously that's a coulpa years old, so when you look at the growth of renewables it's gonna be a higher percentage this year and last. But still it's predominately coal.
It is, but renewables are getting cheaper and cheaper. Massive increase in wind farm and solar projects and we are yet to really test offshore wind and tidal in any meaningful way.

The big wildcard for me is hydrogen. If we crack that nut it’s a game changer. My concern though is that like CSG in the past, we seem more interested in export opportunities rather than energy security.
 

Bandwagon

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
45,908
It is, but renewables are getting cheaper and cheaper. Massive increase in wind farm and solar projects and we are yet to really test offshore wind and tidal in any meaningful way.

The big wildcard for me is hydrogen. If we crack that nut it’s a game changer. My concern though is that like CSG in the past, we seem more interested in export opportunities rather than energy security.

It's a problem for sure, the right policy approach would have seen us reduce coal and expand gas generation years ago, as it much better complements the expansion of renewables, and there's an abundance of it.

Instead we've bumbled along and fought unwinnable climate wars much to our detriment, which has mostly served to enrichen multinationals and push up the price of power.

Hydrogen could be a game changer, as could advancements in Nukes if they get SMR's delivering on the potential advantages they make.
 

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
53,228
It's a problem for sure, the right policy approach would have seen us reduce coal and expand gas generation years ago, as it much better complements the expansion of renewables, and there's an abundance of it.

Instead we've bumbled along and fought unwinnable climate wars much to our detriment, which has mostly served to enrichen multinationals and push up the price of power.

Hydrogen could be a game changer, as could advancements in Nukes if they get SMR's delivering on the potential advantages they make.
That’s true.

Declaration: I worked in mining for many years.

I think the mining lobby undoubtedly f**ked over Rudd when he tried to get an emissions trading scheme up, but that was more about the mechanics rather than outright avoidance.

Since then the big players have been very cautious about thermal coal because they recognise it will be phased out. That’s provided an opportunity for 2nd and 3rd tier miners to jump in and try and make a shit sandwich work but who really cares about them?

I think the coalition have convinced themselves that climate action = Ooga Booga, but the reality is that Industry have largely been preparing for this.

The lack of Government leadership on climate change in recent years has been embarrassing and completely unnecessary.
 

Bandwagon

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
45,908
That’s true.

Declaration: I worked in mining for many years.

I think the mining lobby undoubtedly f**ked over Rudd when he tried to get an emissions trading scheme up, but that was more about the mechanics rather than outright avoidance.

Since then the big players have been very cautious about thermal coal because they recognise it will be phased out. That’s provided an opportunity for 2nd and 3rd tier miners to jump in and try and make a shit sandwich work but who really cares about them?

I think the coalition have convinced themselves that climate action = Ooga Booga, but the reality is that Industry have largely been preparing for this.

The lack of Government leadership on climate change in recent years has been embarrassing and completely unnecessary.

As have the rest of the world, the final nail in the coffin was the EU's plans for a tax on goods from nations not playing to their rules. Which was entirely foreseeable. They weren't gonna penalise themselves forever on trade, it was only a matter of the mechanism.

It doesn't matter any more what your belief or position on climate change is, the fact is it's now the financial reality, either get with the program, or suffer the losses of not doing so.
 
Messages
12,132
He's a car crash. Name the date and call the election already 😠!

(From what I'm hearing, looks like it will be called on 9-11 April for an election date of Sat 14 May - a min 33 days notice.)
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,277
Alot of places seem very gas and nuclear dependent .... Thats a bit sucky yeah?

What is australias break down per source?
In the context of climate change, nuclear is great. Greenie purists hate it for other reasons. Nuclear won’t happen here because it takes decades to set it up and you burn cash in the billions. The cost of renewables is constantly coming down and the cost per gw blows nuclear out of the water.

72D54652-D4F3-44FB-9882-50EC2FA33AC6.jpeg
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,277
There was a breakthrough in fusion something something during the week. Above my pay grade so don’t bother asking me about it.

 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
79,089
Yeah i get the nuclear good but risky bit.

But it seems all those countries in europe that are held up as bastions of renewables still have a very high dependency on some other backup that isnt considered good.

Obviously you hope renewables continue to improve over time. But they still have seem to have their reliability issues.

What will australias backup be? Gas?
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,277
Yeah i get the nuclear good but risky bit.

But it seems all those countries in europe that are held up as bastions of renewables still have a very high dependency on some other backup that isnt considered good.

Obviously you hope renewables continue to improve over time. But they still have seem to have their reliability issues.

What will australias backup be? Gas?
Gas will be used as we transition away from coal, but won’t feature long term. We are behind the 8 ball because other countries started their transition decades ago.


Nothwithstanding the scaremongering and panic seeding ^^^^ by the coalition, power companies can see that their coal investments are going the way of VHS tapes.

'Biggest battery in Southern Hemisphere'​

In its place, the company said it has "well-progressed plans" for battery storage of up to 700 megawatts on the site.
 

Latest posts

Top