OT: Current Affairs and Politics

[Gary Gutful]

I could write an essay on forum creeps.

Title: Unpleasant Forum Characters: Hineyrulz and Hindy111

Introduction: Online forums are dynamic spaces where individuals from diverse backgrounds come together to share ideas, opinions, and engage in discussions. While most forum members contribute positively to the community, there are instances where certain individuals stand out for their unsettling behavior. This essay explores the creepy and unlikeable attributes of two forum members, Hineyrulz and Hindy111.

Hineyrulz: The Unsettling Presence Hineyrulz, a pseudonymous figure on the forum, has consistently exhibited behavior that leaves other members feeling uneasy. One of the most noticeable traits is a tendency to obsessively focus on specific topics, often straying into uncomfortable territory. For instance, Hineyrulz frequently delves into overly personal details about other members' lives, creating an atmosphere of discomfort and invasion of privacy.
Furthermore, Hineyrulz's communication style is marked by an excessive use of sarcasm and condescension. This not only undermines the spirit of healthy discussion but also contributes to a toxic environment within the forum. The constant need to belittle others' opinions, without offering constructive criticism, alienates fellow members and disrupts the collaborative nature of the community.

Hindy111: The Pervasive Negativity Hindy111, another forum member, stands out for a different set of reasons. While not necessarily invasive like Hineyrulz, Hindy111 has earned a reputation for consistently spreading negativity throughout the forum. Instead of engaging in constructive dialogue, Hindy111 often resorts to insults and dismissive remarks, creating a hostile environment that discourages open communication.
Moreover, Hindy111 seems to thrive on stirring up controversy. Rather than contributing valuable insights to discussions, this member frequently derails conversations by introducing irrelevant or incendiary topics. The resulting chaos disrupts the forum's overall purpose, turning it into a breeding ground for conflict rather than a space for meaningful exchange of ideas.

Conclusion: In any online community, fostering a positive and collaborative environment is essential for the well-being of its members. Unfortunately, individuals like Hineyrulz and Hindy111, with their creepy and unlikeable behavior, pose a threat to the harmony of the forum. It is crucial for forum moderators and administrators to address such issues promptly, implementing measures to maintain a healthy and welcoming space for everyone. Encouraging constructive dialogue, respectful communication, and enforcing community guidelines can help mitigate the impact of unpleasant forum characters, ensuring a more positive experience for all members.

 

[T.S Quint]

Get off Chat GPT and do your own work, ffs!

 

[hineyrulz]

Gary GPTFul.

 

[Gronk]

I'm awarding quote of the week a day early this week. Ladies and Gentlemen, Ms Lisa Wilkinson

“You were thrilled by the riveting commercial appeal of the story that she told,” Mr Richardson asked.

“Please don’t make me sound like a cheap, tabloid journalist, Mr Richardson,” Ms Wilkinson replied.

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/sounds-paranoid-brittany-higgins-boyfriend-david-sharazs-email-to-lisa-wilkinson/news-story/55c179478559605c87de9950453a6f5e

What the article failed to offer was context. Of course News Ltd didn’t provide the full transcript. I watched the Federal Court trial stream on YouTube and essentially Richardson implied that Ch10 paid Higgins and he hoped that Wilkinson would devulge a secret payment under oath, like Bruce Lerhmann had to with Ch7*.

* Ch7 claimed they did not pay Bruce to do any interviews, except for his accomodation when he came up to Sydney. What was actually revealed under oath was that Ch7 paid Bruce’s rent in Sydney for 12 months in an under the table deal. Cheque book journalism. They are still paying his rent at a house with a pool in the northern beaches, after living in the eastern suburbs for the first 6 months.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/media/channel-7-spotlights-exclusive-bruce-lehrmann-interview-revoked-as-finalist-in-walkley-awards/news-story/9859fd054c443ff9d0039ad70f284443

 

[King-Gutho94]

Exactly. The medium she made her fortune and name for herself was as host of a breakfast television show where she engaged in inane chit chat, network promotion and juvenile innuendo with her co host... But yeah, she's a hard hitting serious journo above reproach in her own estimation. Her and her eunuch husband are made for each other....

Completely agree does anyone remember her insane ramblings demanding Scomo to lock everyone down in there houses when covid happened.

Then praising Dan Andrews for the harsh lockdown he did in Victoria that broke a lot of people and blasting NSW for causing covid chaos in Victoria.

She and her bandana dimwitted husband deserve each other.

I always thought Karl was the idiot all those years on the Today show he and Lisa hosted together. And while Karl is still an idiot. Lisa is a bigger one.

 

[strider]

Gary GPTFul.

SemenGPT

 

[hindy111]

Gary GPTFul.

The forum is turning on us. Analed by our own men

 

[the phantom menace]

...demanding Scomo to lock everyone down in there houses when covid happened.

Then praising Dan Andrews for the harsh lockdown he did in Victoria that broke a lot of people and blasting NSW for causing covid chaos in Victoria.

Still agree with all of those points of view, to be honest.

 

[hindy111]

Title: Unpleasant Forum Characters: Hineyrulz and Hindy111

Introduction: Online forums are dynamic spaces where individuals from diverse backgrounds come together to share ideas, opinions, and engage in discussions. While most forum members contribute positively to the community, there are instances where certain individuals stand out for their unsettling behavior. This essay explores the creepy and unlikeable attributes of two forum members, Hineyrulz and Hindy111.

Hineyrulz: The Unsettling Presence Hineyrulz, a pseudonymous figure on the forum, has consistently exhibited behavior that leaves other members feeling uneasy. One of the most noticeable traits is a tendency to obsessively focus on specific topics, often straying into uncomfortable territory. For instance, Hineyrulz frequently delves into overly personal details about other members' lives, creating an atmosphere of discomfort and invasion of privacy.
Furthermore, Hineyrulz's communication style is marked by an excessive use of sarcasm and condescension. This not only undermines the spirit of healthy discussion but also contributes to a toxic environment within the forum. The constant need to belittle others' opinions, without offering constructive criticism, alienates fellow members and disrupts the collaborative nature of the community.

Hindy111: The Pervasive Negativity Hindy111, another forum member, stands out for a different set of reasons. While not necessarily invasive like Hineyrulz, Hindy111 has earned a reputation for consistently spreading negativity throughout the forum. Instead of engaging in constructive dialogue, Hindy111 often resorts to insults and dismissive remarks, creating a hostile environment that discourages open communication.
Moreover, Hindy111 seems to thrive on stirring up controversy. Rather than contributing valuable insights to discussions, this member frequently derails conversations by introducing irrelevant or incendiary topics. The resulting chaos disrupts the forum's overall purpose, turning it into a breeding ground for conflict rather than a space for meaningful exchange of ideas.

Conclusion: In any online community, fostering a positive and collaborative environment is essential for the well-being of its members. Unfortunately, individuals like Hineyrulz and Hindy111, with their creepy and unlikeable behavior, pose a threat to the harmony of the forum. It is crucial for forum moderators and administrators to address such issues promptly, implementing measures to maintain a healthy and welcoming space for everyone. Encouraging constructive dialogue, respectful communication, and enforcing community guidelines can help mitigate the impact of unpleasant forum characters, ensuring a more positive experience for all members.

I'll take that as we won't be catching up for a beer next time you're in Sydney?

 

[strider]

Someone needs to build, TLDR-GPT to give an executive summary ..... every bit of waffly crap someone gets from ChatGPT ive seen is long winded horseshit

 

[Incorrect]

Someone needs to build, TLDR-GPT to give an executive summary ..... every bit of waffly crap someone gets from ChatGPT ive seen is long winded horseshit

Or at least rename ChatGPT to RamGPT..

 

[Gary Gutful]

Someone needs to build, TLDR-GPT to give an executive summary ..... every bit of waffly crap someone gets from ChatGPT ive seen is long winded horseshit

Gronk asked for an essay.

You can just type ‘shorter’ and it summarises.

 

[Gary Gutful]

I'll take that as we won't be catching up for a beer next time you're in Sydney?

It was ChatGPT’s fault. I asked it to say nice things.

 

[hineyrulz]

It was ChatGPT’s fault. I asked it to say nice things.

 

[Gronk]

This is the media we're talking about here. Perception is everything. The fact is language is a dog whistle, and the Guardian's readers definitely want to read about how that villain Lehrmann is 'denying' rather than 'defending' (the language used by the Australian). Mainstream media orgs are selling moral entertainment to people who want their view of the world reinforced.

Ironically you are viewing this situation through a judgemental lense yourself.

You would think that anyone jumping into the analysis of deliberate editorial syntax, that they would do so from an unbiased position.

As much as you say what Guardian readers want, don't you think it's clear what Australian readers want ? So here you are bashing one side and leaving the other alone.

Ironically, the protagonists from the events on that night in parliament house both worked and loved the same political party. It then came down to the power plays of politics on the eve of an election and the patriarchy which has so far determined hiw this has played out.

If we wind back the clock, my original post was about how money buys you justice. One thing that is worth while pondering, is how the male in this story, a nobody from Toowoomba on middle teir staffer wage, has the resources to fund all these court cases. Good luck to him of course, but can you fathom what a 3 or 4 week defamation trial in the federal court would cost to run ? Millions.

 

[the phantom menace]

Ironically you are viewing this situation through a judgemental lense yourself.

I wouldn't say that's ironic... pretty much par for the course for Poupou Escobar and his troll / clown posts

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Ironically you are viewing this situation through a judgemental lense yourself.

Of course.

You would think that anyone jumping into the analysis of deliberate editorial syntax, that they would do so from an unbiased position.

As much as you say what Guardian readers want, don't you think it's clear what Australian readers want ? So here you are bashing one side and leaving the other alone.

I'm not the one who shared articles from these filthy rags. I don't read either of them.

Ironically, the protagonists from the events on that night in parliament house both worked and loved the same political party.

I don't believe they did. Have you ever worked for someone else? If so did you love them? Both 'protagonists' in this shitfight are self-serving opportunists. Higgins' mental health was such a concern that the rape case was called off. Now her mental health is fine and she's the star witness in the civil trial. Cha-ching.

It then came down to the power plays of politics on the eve of an election and the patriarchy which has so far determined hiw this has played out.

If we wind back the clock, my original post was about how money buys you justice. One thing that is worth while pondering, is how the male in this story, a nobody from Toowoomba on middle teir staffer wage, has the resources to fund all these court cases. Good luck to him of course, but can you fathom what a 3 or 4 week defamation trial in the federal court would cost to run ? Millions.

It's not worth pondering at all. We all know exactly why readers of the Guardian and the Australian are so interested in the outcome of these cases. When those readers (voters) are so interested the money was bound to follow.

 

[Gronk]

I don't believe they did. Have you ever worked for someone else? If so did you love them? Both 'protagonists' in this shitfight are self-serving opportunists. Higgins' mental health was such a concern that the rape case was called off. Now her mental health is fine and she's the star witness in the civil trial. Cha-ching.

You have just demonstrated your total lack of knowledge of the case. Best we leave it there.

It's not worth pondering at all. We all know exactly why readers of the Guardian and the Australian are so interested in the outcome of these cases. When those readers (voters) are so interested the money was bound to follow.

I have no idea what you are talking about or perhaps trying to hint.

A mid-tier policy advisor in his mid 20’s has been given a bottomless pit of financial resources to sue Ch10 by a sugar daddy and you’re saying it’s not worth pondering? Why’s that ?

The female in this saga has only ever appeared as a witness.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

You have just demonstrated your total lack of knowledge of the case.

A bit hyperbolic but you knew that.

Best we leave it there.

Suddenly run out of mansplainers have you?

I have no idea what you are talking about or perhaps trying to hint.

A mid-tier policy advisor in his mid 20’s has been given a bottomless pit of financial resources to sue Ch10 by a sugar daddy and you’re saying it’s not worth pondering? Why’s that ?

Gosh why would anyone want to poke Channel 10 in the eye?

The female in this saga has only ever appeared as a witness.

And a very reliable one she is.

 

[strider]

She got he payout ... very convenient. Didnt need a big pay day from ch 10. The reward was already incoming from the australian tax payers.

He is a slimey merkin .... he sees her getting her reward, he wants some of the action too.