What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OT: Current Affairs and Politics

ImTheMan

Juniors
Messages
1,096
images


Watcha gonna do brother?!? Watcha gonna do when the Patriarchy comes for you?!?!!?

*Sips @Gronk tears of fear*

Hulk-Hogan-bats-for-Trump-as-US-President-rips-off-his-shirt-at-Republican-Convention-WATCH.gif

:eek:

Cheers!

stone-cold-donald-trump.gif
 
Last edited:

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
87,670
Um , timeline. Please check it. You'll note that the post that mentions poor people and states, comes well after both my post that mentions exploitation and your assumption that post referred only to the GOP.

Now unless you see the future, it is simply not possible for you to make that assumption based upon a post I am yet to post. Therefore the above reasoning is dogshit.
I knew what you meant before you confirmed it. Your position is pretty clear.
It's not meant to be absolute, if you want to focus upon the absolute those words do indeed express, and ignore the idea, be my guest. If you want to discuss the idea, try not to be a dick about it.
Forgive me for thinking you would say what you meant.
Yeah, demographics can shift, do you see the Dems spending a lot of resources reaching out to these folk in this electoral cycle?
No they've abandoned them. This is my whole point. Their justification is that they are bad people. And this isn't about the resources of politicking, it's about directing the resources of the state when in office.
Huh? what even is this. Of course they don't, they gain advantage from it, why would they complain?
They gain advantage from it because that is the purpose of the electoral college. So everyone is represented, not just the people in the most populous areas.
Well not really, resources are limited, so they'll use them where it best advantages them, why would they waste resources in places they know they won't win?
Because taxes aren't their resources. They are there to benefit Americans who need it most. That means poor people of every race or skin colour. Social class is literally the most accurate way to measure privilege. Democrat race baiting is intended to divide the working class.
 

Bandwagon

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
42,964
I knew what you meant before you confirmed it. Your position is pretty clear.

Ah, so it's the crystal ball. And as for confirming it, I've done no such thing. Your stated confirmation is that I conflated "poor states" with "poor people" , again I did no such thing, If as it was the measure is by income, no such conflation can occur.
Forgive me for thinking you would say what you meant.

I did, is it not common for such words to be used virtually rather than literally?
No they've abandoned them. This is my whole point. Their justification is that they are bad people.

More victim complex bullshit.

They gain advantage from it because that is the purpose of the electoral college. So everyone is represented, not just the people in the most populous areas.

Regardless, you make the point the GOP don't complain, like it means something, so again, why would they.

Because taxes aren't their resources.

We are discussing two different sets of resources here.

They are there to benefit Americans who need it most. That means poor people of every race or skin colour.

Taxes, yeah sure.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
75,485
So we have Kamala Harris, an Indian-Jamaican female lawyer ~ Pete Buttigeig, gay, Harvard educated navy intelligence officer who served In Afganistan, turned Mayor and Mark Kelly, astronaut and senator from Arizona. They would be the leading contenders I’d say, representing the radical left.

Unlikely Trump will debate any of them.

Interesting bunch of months ahead.
 

Bandwagon

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
42,964
For a bloke who criticised the Shakespearean 'racistly', it was very cynical to complain about my misinterpretation of his use of "never/ever".

Lolz, it has no such entomology. And you were being a dick, there's nothing cynical there.
 
Last edited:

Bandwagon

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
42,964
My brother in Christ,

Sorry I don't believe in fairy tales.

Now why don't the Democrats endorse Voter ID?

Why would they support voter suppression

Something, something racism?? Why does Australia do it? Oh wait nm, racism?

When exactly was the last time you had to produce ID to vote in an Australian election?

Oh you you haven't had to?

Lolz

"Cept" "Racistly", right? A connoisseur of language when the occasion is right

That burns you still hey.

More Lolz
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
33,010
So we have Kamala Harris, an Indian-Jamaican female lawyer ~ Pete Buttigeig, gay, Harvard educated navy intelligence officer who served In Afganistan, turned Mayor and Mark Kelly, astronaut and senator from Arizona. They would be the leading contenders I’d say, representing the radical left.

Unlikely Trump will debate any of them.

Interesting bunch of months ahead.
Such diversity, like a Netflix series. Any amputees in the running?
 
Top