I don't wish anything to be any way. I'm not the one who looks for simple explanations for things. But I do know one of the reasons 'science' keeps changing is because it's been politicised, leading to research that is accepted by the credulous despite being resistant to replication.
"The ‘replication crisis’ has introduced a number of considerable challenges, including compromising the public’s trust in science and undermining the role of science and scientists as reliable sources to inform evidence-based policy and practice"
Korbmacher and colleagues from the FORRT project discuss how the last decade can be seen as a credibility revolution for psychological science, benefitting from structural, procedural and community-driven changes.
www.nature.com