I'm more tolerant and at least interested in understanding the concerns of people who have a problem, even if I personally don't.
Easy to go full Rudd and smugly dismiss people, but it stops important conversations.
Bully for you mate, but all this confected outrage about shit is just that.
Dangerous to shut down conversation. You might not agree with people having a problem, but they have every right to express their concerns without being smugly dismissed.
Whoa there laddie, who's talking about shutting down conversation? If I choose to ignore merkins getting riled up about dumb shit that's my business, i'm not demanding they be silenced, but by the same token am I under some social obligation to accept any given grievance as valid? You're free to express your grievances as you please, but there is no inherent right that they not be smugly dismissed, the world of ideas doesn't need f**king participation awards.
There are some serious issues around the day, but News Corp fawning outrage over a group of pubs not celebrating it, or last years effort of Woolies not selling tacky plastic patriotism is not one of them.
These things literally affect no one in any meaningful way, and I dare say we'd near all be oblivious to it if not for the likes of News Corp whipping up a storm in a teacup over it. You wanna talk about shutting down debate? what do you reckon these kind of stories and the way they are pitched does for debate?
Particularly given the story is based on the lie of the group not celebrating being sold as the group banning celebration.
But as we see from above, the group's been beaten into submission. Great result for freedom of expression that hey?