I don't dislike him personally and have praised him when I think he deserved it, he looked to be gaining form a few weeks ago and i love that he looks quick though I wish they could make use of it more but that's on Nathan being out more than anything. that ankle tap was perfect and it was pure luck it didnt come off.
He's making more tackles because teams are attacking him more. He's a perceived weakness not just to us but to our own coaches and opposition coaches. There's something there even if the constant talk is making it sound more dramatic than it should.
Fair enough, I think he does go looking for defensive work as well which contributes to his higher tackle rate.
If you look at his prior seasons output 22,23, 24 he has made 15.7, 14.8 and 17.7 tackle per game respectively. Stephen Crichton when he played for us in 22 and 23, made 14 and 11.75 tackles per game. Incidentally, Crichton's effective tackle percentage was lower as well. He made fewer tackles, missed more tackles and made less runs than Tago.
I think it is the error rate, that separates the two. I cannot get data for prior years on errors, so I can only say that last year Tago wasn't in the top 50 list for errors made, this year he is the 18th worst in errors per game in the NRL (players who played 10 games or more).
I should add, Tago is incurring a lot of penalties this year as well. Kenny, Luai and Leota are also penalty machines. In fact, the team is the second worst in the NRL for conceding penalties, with the Roosters first (By margin of 1.3 more per game). Our error rate is not too bad though and we are 13th in the NRL for errors made, better than all the teams left in the finals.
For the sake of the team, if Tago and Luai can reduce their error rates, and if Tago, Kenny and Luai can reduce the penalties, we will significantly improve our share of possession.