Panther fans, did Gus do the right thing?

[Mr Angry]

I am unsure what the majority think.

Panther fans only.

 

[umina panther]

No he gave Griffin a job in the first place

 

[OldPanther]

I am unsure what the majority think.

Panther fans only.

I've said yes. Get it done and let the boys focus on the premiership with Ciro running the show(please be good at this coaching thing) speaking if did you get a response about Ciraldo @Panther_Daz ?

 

[Bob]

He certainly did

 

[Black Magik]

Absolutely. This was done for the club not individual reasons.

We no longer wish to suffer in mediocrity.

 

[Fangs]

Sacked Griffin, finally. One tick.

Minus points for not doing at the end of the 2017 season.

 

[mxlegend99]

Sacking Hook? Yes. Although it should have happened 12 months ago rather than his extension.

The Ivan Cleary situation has been poorly handled though. But depenfing on the story you believe theres a chance Gus has not been part of that.

 

[franklin2323]

Timing was wrong though

 

[MrBlack]

Did he need to be sacked - greater majority will say yes

Timing?? - well we will know after this weeks game. Let the players tell us if the timing was right.

 

[chrisD]

You have to be more specific, as I don't believe Gould wanted to sack him now or maybe at all, but that his hand was forced.

Yes it is a good thing Griffin is gone and gone before the finals, as it gives us a chance to turn our form around.

 

[age.s]

I like an "I have no idea and the proof will be in the pudding" option.

 

[Blade23]

Yes but the timing was wrong.
It should have been done after our year finishes. He also shouldn't have had 2 years left on his contract.

 

[jane the pain]

No he gave Griffin a job in the first place

Griffin did a lot things right here. I know you won't accept that because of your hatred. In answer to the post, I believe this is a board driven agenda, and was done behind Gus's back.

 

[Whino]

Either should have been done 2 months ago or at the end of the year, assuming we had crashed out early in the finals under Griffin.

 

[umina panther]

Griffin did a lot things right here. I know you won't accept that because of your hatred. In answer to the post, I believe this is a board driven agenda, and was done behind Gus's back.

Nothing goes on behind Gus'back

 

[PenrithPanther45]

Gus seemed to suggest that Griffin would have known on Monday that he was gone by the end of the year so getting rid of him now probably ensures any ill-feelings he may have had didn't rub off or influence the players and their training. It is better to have someone like Ciraldo who'd be totally committed.

 

[jane the pain]

Nothing goes on behind Gus'back

Oh so you were there then? Solid assumption.

 

[Buzzard Breath]

Yes but the timing was wrong.
It should have been done after our year finishes. He also shouldn't have had 2 years left on his contract.

Yep.

 

[OldPanther]

Yep.

By all reports there was either no choice or Griffin chose it.

 

[Buzzard Breath]

By all reports there was either no choice or Griffin chose it.

What O'Neill allegedly did I believe there was no choice after that. Gus had to move him on.
Ideally if he was on the outer it should have happened sooner.
The yep is for he shouldn't have been extended last year either.