What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

papenhuyzen

possm

Coach
Messages
15,912
People on this forum seem weirdly fixated on the tackle efficiency stat

Completed tackles don't always mean a better defender, especially for backs. I'll give you 2 broad examples.

An edge forward might rush up in defence on an opponent playmaker to "get in his face". With a bit of quick footwork the playmaker may beat the tackle one-on-one, but due to being rushed and forced to move by that edge forward, the attack still breaks down and he's tackled by someone else. This is successful defence - but recorded as a missed tackle, and subtracted from his efficiency

Example 2. Matt Feagai is defending on his wing - misreads the attack and the ball sails wide to an unmarked attacker to score without Feagai laying a hand on him. Unsuccessful defence, with no missed tackle recorded by Feagai
I don't believe that Matt Feagai decided to rush in each time. I believe he most probably did so because he was directed to do this in certain circumstances. The fault lies on the edge where we were stripped for numbers because someone was not doing their job in defense very well.
 

Latest posts

Top