My take on his comments about playing 5/8 is that he has almost certainly had discussions with kearney on the topic, and he was being solid with those plans.
I reckon he is copping it very unfairly from some parra fans.
He has clearly adjusted his game massively to the style the coach wants him to. Not only that, he is doing it beautifully. He is playing much better than people are giving credit when you consider that he has had to make considerable changes to his style.
People are fixating on his kick returns and perceptions about effort when he is actually working his arse off, as well as being very unselfish in modifying the style he is playing.
It has cost him the flashy moments from his game; it has cost him a rep jumper that obviously means a lot to him.
He is carrying our team single handedly and yet a bug potion of our own fans are kicking him?
I guess it is a moot point now as Roberts will most likely be the 5/8th next year.
My point in making Hayne a 6 is that basically he will control the team almost 4 out of the 6 plays. (Does not include the rucking out from our end of the field).
It will be what he is accountable for. To setup plays for the eels.
I don't think that he performs his fullback duties 100% because he is playing a 2nd five eighth role and hence, we lose the supporting fullback and strong kick returns.
At 1, he is not 100% accountable for playmaking as the 6 & 7 must take some responsibility. Hence, Hayne can take a back seat if he wants to.
At 6, he would be fully accountable for playmaking and since he is our best playmaker, he should perform most of the playmaking.
All that talk about, what about the extra defense, well, he'll get use to it.
It doesn't stop Lockyer, Thurston or Soward does it?
Lastly, I for one believe that Hayne is in good form. However, I reckon he could be better especially at 6 and the team would have better direction as Hayne would be in charge of the attack.