What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Parramatta Leagues Club board sacked, administrator appointed

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,379
I don't agree that this should be counted in the cap.
The cap is supposedly to limit the amount clubs spend on their playing roster in any given year. Once the NRL accepted that Choc could no longer form part of our playing roster, they logically could no longer include his salary in the cap.

This is distinct from who pays out the remainder of his employment contract with us, the insurance company or the club as his employer.
I don't really see the point of including any payment in the cap if it's for players no longer at a club. I understand the need for an actual pay out where a player is released, but why should it count under the cap? Who benefits from that?
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,708
The Watmough deal will go down as the dumbest deal in NRL history. Or if they had a cunning plan, then it backfired.

Lucky we got out of the Foran $1M exit clause deal, otherwise that would have got 2nd prize.

.
 

Obscene Assassin

First Grade
Messages
6,356
The Watmough deal will go down as the dumbest deal in NRL history. Or if they had a cunning plan, then it backfired.

Lucky we got out of the Foran $1M exit clause deal, otherwise that would have got 2nd prize.

.

Karl Filiga to the Sharks is way worse than Watmough. 400k and only played 11 minutes off the bench.

Watmough was at like 30k per game whereas Filiga was 40k per minute.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,379
What's the point in that? Wasting your money on a player who is a risk.
The rich clubs prefer to spend their money on a great player who is a lesser risk.
Unlike other rich clubs we were coming from a position of weakness, meaning we had to take bigger risks. And because of the retirement clause it was low risk anyway.

Brad Arthur is smart. Neither the Watmough nor Foran contracts ended up hurting us.
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,171
Unlike other rich clubs we were coming from a position of weakness, meaning we had to take bigger risks. And because of the retirement clause it was low risk anyway.

Brad Arthur is smart. Neither the Watmough nor Foran contracts ended up hurting us
.

Didn't Foran's contract and a portion of Watmough's hurt us this year because they had illegal TPA's associated with them?
 

Latest posts

Top