Kent probably has good reason to not wanna talk about off-field dramas....
Kinda funny hearing Ben Ikin chastising player misbehaviour.
Anyone remember his antics at a Gold Coast nightclub which ended with him getting a broken jaw?
His behaviour wasn't any better at the Bears.Kent probably has good reason to not wanna talk about off-field dramas....
Kinda funny hearing Ben Ikin chastising player misbehaviour.
Anyone remember his antics at a Gold Coast nightclub which ended with him getting a broken jaw?
You're doing facts wrong.
You don't blurt out your bullshit opinion and it automatically becomes fact.
The Super League war was where it started.There is just a very toxic relationship between the media the clubs. Who knows how it started, but it it's massively handicapping the game, and if very peculiar to NRL.
On another note, J.T's book is a great read. ,
Greenberg number is 1800 NOFKNPTHe was responding to the Greenberg interview. If you’ve a problem with the notion of failed clubs being relocated you might want to ring Todd!
He was responding to the Greenberg interview. If you’ve a problem with the notion of failed clubs being relocated you might want to ring Todd!
No. Kent's response was his interpretation you numbscull! Other people could have interpreted Greenburgs statement very differently. And thankfully Phil Gould has proposed a twenty team two conference set up in lieu of the negativity from Kent's interpretation.
How would you expect him to “interpret” the nrl ceo saying relocation is something they are considering you goose?
That whole relocation of a Sydney team is a beat-up.
He's raising fear amongst the fears and making them angry against the CEO over nothing.
Kent said that there's a provision within the NRL charter whereby they can relocate teams that are struggling.
This has always been around. Anyone remember 1995 when Balmain became the Sydney Tigers and played at Parramatta; When Canterbury became Sydney Bulldogs and played at Parramatta. When Easts became Sydney City?
Kent was just talking about a rule that exists to tap into the constant chatter that they've been trying to turn into a big deal for the last few years.
Why? Because if they get everyone keen on axing an NRL club and the NRL goes through with it, the News Ltd mob can then attack the NRL for axing an NRL club.
It's a win/win situation for them.
Create chaos=win
Stability is their worst enemy.
That whole relocation of a Sydney team is a beat-up.
He's raising fear amongst the fears and making them angry against the CEO over nothing.
Kent said that there's a provision within the NRL charter whereby they can relocate teams that are struggling.
This has always been around. Anyone remember 1995 when Balmain became the Sydney Tigers and played at Parramatta; When Canterbury became Sydney Bulldogs and played at Parramatta. When Easts became Sydney City?
Kent was just talking about a rule that exists to tap into the constant chatter that they've been trying to turn into a big deal for the last few years.
Why? Because if they get everyone keen on axing an NRL club and the NRL goes through with it, the News Ltd mob can then attack the NRL for axing an NRL club.
It's a win/win situation for them.
Create chaos=win
Stability is their worst enemy.