Get Rid of The Donkeys
Coach
- Messages
- 14,822
Didn't he request a release last season?Sack Payne Haas
Didn't he request a release last season?Sack Payne Haas
Was there a non parole period set though as that is quite unusual to only serve 1 month of a 9 month sentence.I don't know what point you're trying to make.
The sentence was handed down by a judge.
I don't know if it was the parole board or the judge who decided to let her out after serving just one month of a nine month sentence, but it was their decision and had nothing to do with QLD gov.
Are you arguing that the judge had no choice but to sentence her to nine months with a stipulation she must be released after serving just one month behind bars?
If she served the full nine months then three people would still be alive.
The cops refused to charge her a few years ago after she stalked a woman at a park, stole her phone then vandalised it by stomping on it.
She physically attacked a delivery driver and a woman at a Valleys Diehards juniors game.
This woman is a repeat offender and should never have been given leniency by the courts.
I have no idea. God knows how many other violent recidivist criminals are walking around SEQ.Was there a non parole period set though as that is quite unusual to only serve 1 month of a 9 month sentence.
I understand courts set a non parole period even for sentences of less than 1 year i.e the non parole period is the prison term the offender must serve in prison before being eligible for parole.
The Parole system will come under scrutiny again over this case as people will rightfully ask how someone sentenced to a 9 month term could be released after 1 month.I'm not arguing that at all.
I'm saying that any time anyone blames 'the system' for these things, they inevitably have absolutely no idea how 'the system' actually works - whether that be blaming the judge who sentenced a defendant at the sentencing hearing, the parole hearing who let someone out, the bail hearing who set bail, whatever.
There is a whole series of events that goes into ANY legal decision, whatever law or Act it's made under, and there are a whole mess of people involved in the events leading up to that decision. Parole isn't chucked around like confetti, for eg, there is a hearing before whatever the relevant body is in each state or territory where the case must be made for release.
Are you suggesting that we do away with parole or 'good behaviour' entirely because a handful of offenders reoffend before their initial sentence is complete?
Who's to say they don't do the same or worse once it is anyway? Who's to blame then? Some people are just awful.
Not sure the allegation of manslaughter will stick though? - My knowledge of this area is people in similar circumstances being charged with dangerous operation of a vehicle causing death.
It is such a very very sad case with 3 folk's lives allegedly ended by the alleged actions of someone that should in all intensive purposes still be in jail allegedly.
For all intents and purposes” is an example of tautology, which is an intentionally redundant phrase.For all intents and purposes.......smh.
For all intents and purposes” is an example of tautology, which is an intentionally redundant phrase.
It’s always typical that the system comes under review after something horrible has happened when 99% of the public k ew it was already broken before handThe Parole system will come under scrutiny again over this case as people will rightfully ask how someone sentenced to a 9 month term could be released after 1 month.
Sure the crime she was sentenced for originally has no comparison at all to this alleged crime but parole boards do have a duty of care to the general public when granting offenders parole.
Did 1 month in prison rehabilitate the offender to the extent of them not transgressing again as they would take into account the offenders criminal history also in determining this.
Ignorant people only think there is only British law thoughActually "for all intents and purposes" is a phrase from British law with a very specific purpose and meaning. For intensive purposes is a shibboleth used by ignorant people to notify others that they are ignorant.
It meets the requirements of that purpose very intensively.
Mate, u never know….this family is becoming curse on the club!Sack Payne Haas
By me, for sure. I do not care what colour foreign criminals are. If you read what I wrote I’m pretty sure Ive already made that point.If she was white and her name was Sharon Smith do you really think the subject of deportation would have even been raised?
I have no problem with “allegedly driving the vehicle”.Except that's not how the law, law reporting, or legal language works.
She was allegedly driving the vehicle with a suspended license. Those are the facts at hand. Simple really.
If only each seat had its own laws and police force ey?Ah yes... regional QLD, historically dominated by left-wing politics and politicians.