Peach > GC?

blacktip-reefy · Jul 16, 2005

Simmons is a reserve grader at best. he has nevr had a match winning performance.

Bird is 20 years of age & nother club is interested in him, like Simmo, yet at cronulla, the cronulla that you agree with Wilson about, they are heroes(colliding opinios again?)

Raper was never a choice I would have gone with. he has not performed at all.

Kimmorley has under achieved for his pay packet.

vagana has massively under acheived for his pay packet.

Tommy is a dumb farger & is good for comedy value & old stories.

They are real reasons for criticsing players sensibly.
There is no logic, facts ore reasons for your criticisms of nuttley peach et al except for the fact they are not as good as the best player in each of their positions.

pogo · Jul 16, 2005

credit where its due i reckon.

peachey was in extra good form tonight , a really good effort in all areas of the game.

Mako · Jul 16, 2005

pogo said:
credit where its due i reckon.

peachey was in extra good form tonight , a really good effort in all areas of the game.

Congrats pogo on recognising his effort.

Sharkie73 · Jul 16, 2005

Peach has stated that he wants to be a one club man like ET

Alan Shore · Jul 16, 2005

pogo said:
this is the first season i have suggested he is well past his best!

many other people in the rugby league community are saying this also.

tommy raudonikis states in last weeks paper that "peachey is playing like a reserve grader"

what 'sinister' reasons could there possibly be?

all this is an assessment of a player you are so enamoured of you refuse to see what is there in front of you.
no one hopes he plays well more than i do, i dont death ride em like you backflip.

by the way is there a "sinister" reason behind your bashing of simmons? bird? raper? kimmorley? vagana?

Tommy's brain must be singed by all that chain smoking...

Coastal Shark · Jul 16, 2005

Captain Jack Sparrow said:
Racism and bickering aside pogo.

Why does Peachey have to even attempt so many one on one tackles?

That's the simple question that was asked.

I'll answer it Capn.

Missed tackles in the front line!!

black_dot · Jul 16, 2005

blacktip-reefy said:
Yes I can confirm that the Peach has been in the GC's plans all along.
They were trying hard to get a very good fullback who debuted this year but was hurriedly re-signed.

just on this reefy, peach might have been in the coasts plans all along, but if this is the case, they didn't let him know about it ! LOL !

David had no idea about any issue or plans of the gold coast to try and sign him until someone called him and told him about the article in the paper this week

Very odd to have someone " in your plans all along" but never approach him or call him , when you KNOW he is looking elsewhere and the UK was his best option.

He may well end up on the coast, but he didn't know anything about them until the papers reported he was in their plans LOL !!

Nullajet · Jul 17, 2005

Anyone claiming that Peach is past his best has not watched his games this season. He has created most of best attacking plays and made some brilliant trysaving tackles or manouvres. There is no one else at this club even close to his ability in this position and the club is foolish for allowing him to go, when he clearly would be happy to stay!

If he is past his time, why then couldn't someone ten years younger catch up to him in support when he makes a break?? And lets face it he isnt as quick as he used to be!!

You can all claim to be a big fan of the man, but if you truly believe his form warrents his being let go........you are kidding yourselves!

blacktip-reefy · Jul 17, 2005

black_dot said:
just on this reefy, peach might have been in the coasts plans all along, but if this is the case, they didn't let him know about it ! LOL !

David had no idea about any issue or plans of the gold coast to try and sign him until someone called him and told him about the article in the paper this week

Very odd to have someone " in your plans all along" but never approach him or call him , when you KNOW he is looking elsewhere and the UK was his best option.

He may well end up on the coast, but he didn't know anything about them until the papers reported he was in their plans LOL !!

Who manages peach Dotter?

black_dot · Jul 17, 2005

I don't know mate, who does ? he doesn't have peaches phone number whoever it is !

Daryl mather ? George mimis ? I dont know mate.

Frenzy. · Jul 17, 2005

black_dot said:
I don't know mate, who does ? he doesn't have peaches phone number whoever it is !

Daryl mather ? George mimis ? I dont know mate.

It's [size=-1] Daryl Mather[/size]

blacktip-reefy · Jul 17, 2005

Who what when spoke to who what when?
I know pretty first hand who the Coast have been planning on getting for some years.
did the Coast speak to peach about his plans last year? or his manager?

Macca · Jul 17, 2005

So you are saying that Peachey's manager doesn't tell Dave who he is talking to?

black_dot · Jul 18, 2005

OKay Reefy, so your info is that Peachey has been in the gold coasts plans for what, A few years ? and are you implying they spoke to Peach last year about his plans ?

Cause Mather wasnt the guy who phoned Dave to tell him that he was being linked to the gold coast in the papers, thus providing peach with the first clue he'd ever had about the gold coast or there interest, and that happened LAST WEEK.

So, if your source at the coast is correct, and you are implying they spoke to dave or his manager last year about his plans, then either, your source is telling you porkies, or mather didn't tell his client about the interest.

I think porkies from your source is a better chance of being the case mate.

blacktip-reefy · Jul 18, 2005

I dont think your in a position to know actually.

Macca · Jul 18, 2005

Actually, I know for a fact that he is in a position to know.

blacktip-reefy · Jul 18, 2005

OK
gang ups now.
You guys win, peach said he had not been contacted by the GC so he never was.

end of story.

Need to know basis is a good rule at times.

Macca · Jul 18, 2005

:lol: Ganging up . . . . I don't need to gang up Reefy. It's not personal, I just know Dot is on the money on this occasion.

black_dot · Jul 18, 2005

don't get offended reefy, I tried not to question your source or yoruself in a way that would be personal or critical, we all know things change, but your info just didn't add up to what I know and I said as much, that's all. like I said, it's good to question things mate, and maybe it's worth wondering why you are being told things that may not neccasarily be true, the coaast has linked themselves to every off contract player in the league, seems like this occasion that might be the case too.

King of the Hill · Jul 18, 2005

maybe it's worth wondering why you are being told things that may not neccasarily be true

yep

Peach > GC?

Immortal

Juniors

Juniors

Bench

First Grade

Bench

Juniors

Juniors

Immortal

Juniors

Post Whore

Immortal

Coach

Juniors

Immortal

Coach

Immortal

Coach

Juniors

Coach