Peach > GC?

[black_dot]

I agree King, we all ahave to wonder and I weighed up the bloke who told me, in the manner he did and in the context, and considering the person peach head the news that he was linked to the coast from was named, I believe the story and believe the person telling me 100% , he has never lied before to me about this kind of thing and has always given me the 100% correct story long before the papers and things tell otherwise.

Yes, liike i said you always must question sources, and I don t back away from that, you can only pay what heed you wish to info and stories like this, Im just saying that I reckon it's spot on, not going to ram it down anyones throat at all and I didn't get stuck into reefy for getting it wrong either, just asksed some questions and pointed out some weird things if what he says is true, ie, the player didnt know about it !

 

[King of the Hill]

but the fact peachey says he isnt going doesnt mean he isnt going

reefy knows his GC stuff

 

[black_dot]

I don't doubt it , but this ones hard to explain mate. Peach didnt say hje isnt going, he said he hadnt heard anything from the GC til last week when someone close to him told him it was in paper.

 

[blacktip-reefy]

This still going?
I already said, peach wasnt being considered by the Gold coast until last week.
they never have had 3 fullbacks in their sights at all.
Nobody from anywhere contacted contracted players.
End of Story 2.

 

[black_dot]

The story was never ended mate.

You said peach was in their plans.

I said I had talked to an impecible source who said peach didnt know anything about such plans by the coast til it was in the papers.

You the said he wasnt in their "plans" but in their "sights"

You then asked a question about who managers peach,

That was established but the reason for your bringing it up hasn't been made clear yet.

You asked " did the GC speak to peach or his manager last year ?? " leaving the quesiton in the air, i don't know , but if you know say as much, cause Peach sure as hell didnt know about it, so that would indicate that his manager didn't know, or didnt tell his client.

You then said, gang ups, and that jsut cause peach said he wasnt contacted, that it must be true, you then said " need to know basis" implying that you know something I dont about peach being contacted last year


Now you said peach was never considered by the GC til last week....despite your first claim in this thread that you could now "confirm" that peach was in their plans !

You then say nobody from anywhere contacted any contracted players.

The story is far from complete here reefy !

 

[blacktip-reefy]

That about sums it up.
Can it end now?
It will go no further, I can assure you.

 

[black_dot]

LOL no sweat mate

I can say this for a fact to add to our little discussion, he's keen as mustard to have a crack up there with presto if things don't work out elsewhere

 

[blacktip-reefy]

I know.

 

[black_dot]

don't even start !

 

[Nullajet]

Is there no hope of the sharks seeing sense and signing him for 2006???

 

[imasharkie]

LOL no sweat mate

I can say this for a fact to add to our little discussion, he's keen as mustard to have a crack up there with presto if things don't work out elsewhere

You talk about Peach and an affiliation with Presto. Did anyone notice, besides me, that when Merritt scorred his 2 tries last week the only players to go up to him were Peach, Nige, Mellars, Dykes and Sully to congratulate him. I even noticed after he scored his 2nd, as he walked back with the usuals offering their support Bailey, Simmons and Gallen turned their back to him and walked back to their positions. There is definetely a division amongst the players and I blame Raper.

 

[Frenzy.]

How does anyone know if Peach isn't doing a Darren Albert and choosing not to say anything about it?