What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Peter Roebuck

Patorick

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
9,003
This is such a shame, I wish he hadn't jumped. If these allegations are true (which the laws of probability say they are) he should have faced up to the charges and been brave enough to serve whatever punishment was dealt.

Spare a thought for the ABC guys in SA, who must want to be anywhere but there at the moment. Thursdays test match will be very emotional for them.

Again, not defending him, you can't defend him if the allegations are true, just wish he hadn't jumped and had his day in court so the full story could have come out. Which it still might. Anyway.
 

Patorick

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
9,003
http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/540577.html

A sharp mind, a tormented soul

Peter Roebuck was determined as a player, a fearless internationalist as a cricket writer, and desperately conflicted as a man


Rob Steen
November 15, 2011

"Tragedy" is a noun flung around with thoughtless abandon these days but the life of Peter Roebuck is one that fully justifies such a description. One of the better English openers of the 1980s, consistent and disciplined, if seldom a crowd-pleaser, good enough to amass nearly 25,000 runs and 38 centuries as a professional if not represent his country, he found far wider acclaim as a highly literate student of cricketkind whose erudite analysis of the male psyche informed every word he typed. Behind it all lay a tormented soul, his sexuality a perennial source of gossip in a field of endeavour - male team sport - that still looks dimly, even now, on those who refuse to conform to the heterosexual norm.
Born in Oxford on March 6, 1956, he was one of six offspring of schoolteachers, and grew up initially in a flat in Bath. It was a cricket-loving family: mother kept wicket for Oxford University ladies, who were later captained by one of his sisters. His parents, though, sought to dissuade him from pursuing the game by exposing him to its physical perils. Taken to Peter Wight's indoor school at Bath, the slightly built youth was hit, hurt and whisked to hospital, but desire was undented: "That was the first hurdle overcome." Other, vastly thornier ones, would follow.
He was playing for Somerset 2nd XI at 13, by his own account "a four foot two legspinner, with a good googly, who batted at No. 11 with a sound technique but not enough strength to get runs against far bigger chaps". It was in the halls of academia that he stood proudest, gaining a first-class honours degree in law at Cambridge, making 158 in the 1976 Varsity Match, and helping Combined Universities beat Yorkshire the following year.
That, crucially, was also the summer he suffered a near-fatal injury, ducking into a bouncer from Andy Roberts. He had the gumption to resume his innings, only for another Roberts bumper to dislodge his cap. Retreating to a darkened room and the music of Joni Mitchell, he realised how much he still had to learn: "You never know until you've been hit like that - the smell of leather, you know." This awareness of his own fragility, and the way the game challenged one's courage, fuelled his writing. He proved a compassionate as well as astute judge of cricketers.
He and Ian Botham joined Somerset the same day, and were close enough to co-write a book, It Sort of Clicks. Though chalk and cheese in most respects - Roebuck the introverted loner, Botham the boozy extrovert - the allrounder liked having brainy friends: it fed his ego. Their passion for the game, moreover, was entirely mutual.
Further evidence of a sharp mind and that legal education came at an Oxford University Cricket Society meeting in 1979, shortly after Brian Rose had infamously declared Somerset's innings at 0 for 0 against Worcestershire to secure qualification for the Benson & Hedges Cup quarter-finals (the loophole was quickly closed; what part Roebuck played in advising and emboldening Rose remains open to conjecture). Rose was invited to address the society but sent Roebuck and Peter Denning instead. One member of the audience recalls admiring Roebuck's determination, "as a young man faced with a hostile audience, to speak up for his team and his captain - I remember thinking, 'This is a smart guy but I don't like him.'" In his native land at least, that duality would persist: admiration proved easier to come by than affection.
Expressing himself in print soon proved profitable. Illuminating indeed was his willingness to open up in this context: the preface to It Never Rains - A Cricketer's Lot, his diary of the 1983 season, certainly hinted at inner turmoil. He had been inspired by David Foot's "extraordinary" biography of another Somerset batsman who ended his own life, Harold Gimblett: Tormented Genius of Cricket: "I'm not a genius nor tormented - well, not much…"
The book's title echoed that of Fred Root's autobiography half a century earlier (A Cricket Pro's Lot): if there was one word you couldn't use to describe the way Roebuck painted his lot, it was "glamorous". He also gave due warning as to his future modus operandi: "You will not find much of sex, violence, drugs and booze within these pages. Probably you will suspect, as must a dog surveying a bone, that all the best bits have been taken away, I leave out that side of professional sport because it does not interest me much. It is the individual battles I find fascinating." Which made his subsequent reluctance to interview players all the more curious.

It was in 1983, while Rose was injured and Somerset's stars were immersed in the World Cup, that Roebuck led an inexperienced side and impressed. Three years later he inherited the full-time job from Botham and supported the sacking of Joel Garner and Viv Richards, portrayed as a poor influence; the ensuing row split the club and prompted Botham to leave Taunton in solidarity with the Caribbean duo - and daub "Judas" on Roebuck's dressing-room peg. Roebuck, meanwhile, became unhealthily obsessed with Botham, about whom, ironically, he wrote his most eloquently perceptive sentence: "What happens when you reach the pot at the end of the rainbow too soon?" The feud only ended with Roebuck's death.
How typical that he should enjoy his best summer for Somerset the following year, prompting Wisden to honour him as a Cricketer of the Year. In 1989, with the national selectors all a-dither over the captaincy, he was appointed to lead MCC on a short trip to Holland, only to suffer immediate defeat. After Roebuck had offered his alibis to the press, Micky Stewart, the England coach, advised reporters to disregard what he had said - a door had closed for good.
Retiring from the first-class fray in 1991, he led Devon until 2002, while building a career as a journalist. Making his name at the Sunday Times (where his refusal to cover the Mike Atherton dirt-in-pocket affair at Lord's in 1994 left me holding the baby), he found an even more appreciative audience among Australian editors and readers, who relished his insightful evaluations of their own heroes as much as his often derisory observations of the Poms, a legacy of the rejection he felt so profoundly. An internationalist, his work for the Sydney Morning Herald, already fearless, and later ESPNcricinfo, became admirably, even aggressively, political. "He certainly plays more shots as writer than he ever did as player," attested Simon Wilde in The New Ball Vol. 5 - The Write Stuff. "For that, we should all be grateful."
Come decade's end Roebuck was rarely seen in England, but it was there, in 2001, that he was convicted of assaulting three young South African cricketers who had lodged at his bungalow near Taunton. Sentenced to three four-month jail terms, suspended for two years, he claimed in his all-too-aptly titled autobiography, Sometimes I Forgot To Laugh, that he was unaware his guilty plea meant accepting the plaintiffs' statements as fact. Some suspected a stitch-up - he himself believed the youths were pressured by his Westcountry enemies - but he could no longer call England home. South Africa beckoned, and a tragic end he himself had long foreseen, the sadness heightened by further allegations of sexual misadventure. He had properties in Sydney and Pietermaritzburg but it is hard to believe he ever felt able to call anywhere "home".
Whether he was actually homosexual, or was compelled to repress such urges and chose asexuality, we will probably never know. It doesn't really matter, not now. The point is that he was different, and that being different in the way he was perceived to be different was far more of a liability 25 years ago than it is now. The heart bleeds.

Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton.
 

Hallatia

Referee
Messages
26,433
Fear of detention triggered suicide, says Roebuck's colleague
ESPNcricinfo staff
November 15, 2011

Peter Roebuck was about to be detained over an alleged sexual assault when he committed suicide at his Cape Town hotel, his colleague Jim Maxwell has said. Maxwell, a fellow commentator with the ABC radio service, was the last of Roebuck's friends to see him alive on Saturday night and has given details of the scene of desperation in Roebuck's hotel room.

He told AM radio that the police later confirmed to him they were there to detain Roebuck over an alleged sexual assault on a Zimbabwean man.

Shortly before falling to his death, Roebuck telephoned Maxwell in an extremely agitated and desperate state, telling his friend he needed help in finding a lawyer.

"I'm sure what happened was triggered by the visit of the police and the fact that they were going to charge him with an alleged sexual assault, which meant he was going to be detained and would then have to appear in court on Monday," Maxwell said.

"This is what I discovered when I went to his room after he made a very agitated, dramatic, despairing phone call to my room. He was absolutely on edge.

"When I arrived the detective came out and filled me in on the details. It was then that I asked if I could speak to him [Roebuck] and the detective said 'well, just for a moment', because clearly they didn't want their case compromised in some way, I suppose, by what he [Roebuck] may have said to me.

"So I only had a few moments with him. He was desperate to get in touch with all those students that were in his care in Pietermaritzburg. He didn't have a phone number.

"He asked for a lawyer and I said I'd see what I could do after which I made a reference to John Fairfax, his main employer. He said you won't have to do that because they'll know."

Maxwell says he then left the room, along with one of the two policemen who had been sent to detain Roebuck.

"I'm trying to piece this together, but I'd say that it [Roebuck's death] probably happened fairly quickly," he said.

"If it's the case that there was only one policeman in the room, I'm inclined to the belief that, sadly, when I left the room and the detective came out with me - because I wanted to get his mobile phone number so I could ring him - it may have occurred there and then.

"Because I then moved down the corridor to speak to one of my colleagues, and I was standing in the doorway telling him what had occurred, and within a matter of a minute I could hear outside the lift the detective talking on his mobile phone to someone about how there'd been a complication. And in trying to make out what he was saying it sounded like someone had gone out the window and that person, sadly, was dead."

Maxwell said he did not discuss the sexual assault allegations with Roebuck before his death. "He didn't say anything about them. Obviously it was a matter I would love to have pursued with him, but I don't think the police wanted that talked about. They really just wanted me to be able to make some contact with other people. That's as far as it got."

Roebuck's suicide is being investigated by South African police, who have said they will make a formal statement on it only after the inquest.
Sauce
 

Brutus

Referee
Messages
26,447
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...e-at-1985-dinner/story-e6frey50-1226195241642

Sounds like Pete tried to hit on Gus Worland several years ago as well.

Triple M radio host Gus Worland says deceased commentator Peter Roebuck made him feel uncomfortable at 1985 dinner
TRIPLE M radio host Gus Worland this morning revealed unsettling details of his own experiences with deceased internationally renowned sports journalist Peter Roebuck.
Speaking on Triple M Worland revealed how Roebuck made him to feel "uncomfortable'' and acted "inappropriately'' during a 1985 English county cricket season.
Worland, the star of the An Aussie Goes Bolly cricket documentary, said he and Roebuck were eating dinner at a restaurant in 1985 when Roebuck asked a series of personal questions that Worland believes breached his personal boundaries. Worland was 18 years old at the time.
It is the latest in a string of allegations surfacing about Roebuck's private life, after it was revealed this morning that the former Somerset captain took his own life by jumping from the sixth floor of a Cape Town hotel while being questioned by police on Saturday night.
Roebuck was being investigated over allegations of indecently assaulting a 26-year-old Zimbabwean man, according to reports in South Africa.
"I picked up a vibe from him and it made me feel very uncomfortable,'' Worland said.
"He was talking in a way that was very inappropriate.
"I didn't know how to handle it.
"That has always stayed with me.''
Worland, who was a rookie cricketer in the Somerset team captained by Roebuck, who was 29 years old at the time, said Roebuck had suddenly started to ask him a series of personal questions, including whether or not he had a girlfriend.
Worland said he left the dinner in a hurry on his own.
He summed up the investigation into Roebuck’s death and the ongoing allegations of inappropriate dealings against the cricket commentator and columnist as “a bit of a strange one”.
Follow @Telegraph_Sport on Twitter and like Telegraph Sport on Facebook
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
I have no idea of the amount of people I've asked if they've got a girlfriend. I also had no idea it meant I wanted to rape them.

ffs.
 

Hallatia

Referee
Messages
26,433
I have no idea of the amount of people I've asked if they've got a girlfriend. I also had no idea it meant I wanted to rape them.

ffs.
I know, right. I think this nonsense has something to do with straight guys not liking the advances of gay men. Take it as a compliment and tell them you don't swing that way, it's not hard.

The worst thing about everything I have heard about Poebuck so far, is that people seem so prepared to think the worst of him when the only thing which there is any proof of is that he has made advances to guys who didn't like it but were all above the age of consent.
 
Messages
33,280
I know, right. I think this nonsense has something to do with straight guys not liking the advances of gay men. Take it as a compliment and tell them you don't swing that way, it's not hard.

The worst thing about everything I have heard about Poebuck so far, is that people seem so prepared to think the worst of him when the only thing which there is any proof of is that he has made advances to guys who didn't like it but were all above the age of consent.

Yeah I know right? I mean, smacking teenagers on the bare arse then inspecting it isn't THAT bad, he only had a suspended jail sentence for it :roll:
 

Hallatia

Referee
Messages
26,433
I from my own value system think there is something wrong with doing that, but I can see why he wouldn't think it's that bad and I can see why he was given a suspended sentence for it.
 

Brutus

Referee
Messages
26,447
Be interesting to see the contents of Pete's laptop.

I cannot think of a more dramatic and undignified end to one's life.

It's a shame Pete won't be on the radio tomorrow night to tell us about it.

Would this make for a decent movie?
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...ibutes-to-worker/story-e6frezz0-1226196229772

Secrets taint media tributes to workers after Peter Roebuck's death

Andrew Bolt
The Daily Telegraph
November 16, 2011 6:17AM

IF PETER Roebuck were a Catholic priest, rather than a cricket writer, would there have been this silence?

The silence I mean is the hush by his employers and some close colleagues over what drove him to jump from the sixth floor of his South African hotel on Saturday.

In fact, what we need is not silence but explanations of the kind that many would demand from the Catholic Church.

The bare facts of Roebuck's death were known to media insiders within hours.

On his last evening, detectives interviewed him in his room over allegations of sexual assault. In distress, he called a friend, ABC commentator Jim Maxwell.

Minutes after Maxwell left, and with a policeman still in the room, Roebuck jumped from a window.

True, it's only in the past two days that more details of that alleged assault have emerged with reports that a 26-year-old Zimbabwean man accused Roebuck of sexually assaulting him after making contact through Facebook.

But as Maxwell confirmed on Monday when asked if he knew of the complaint: "I was aware of that a while ago, yes." He wasn't alone.

What was also known -- and for years -- to Roebuck's employers and many commentators now praising him is that a decade ago he was convicted in Britain of causing actual bodily harm to three of the many African boys he'd taken into his home, promising them an education or coaching.

In a statement, one victim said Roebuck told him: "I'm going to cane you now. Then it will be over and I will forgive you and, if I don't cane you, I will feel differently about you." He then chose one of six canes in a rack and delivered "three forceful strokes".

The prosecutor added: "Roebuck then pulled the boy towards him, in what appeared to be an act of affection. He then asked if he could look at the marks on the boy's buttocks, something which he in fact did." Another boy was also asked to show his welts.

Roebuck claimed he was just enforcing discipline, but the judge replied: "It seems so unusual that it must have been done to satisfy some need in you."

Roebuck was sentenced to four months in jail on each count, suspended for two years, but in Australia -- his new home, with South Africa -- his career bloomed.

He was a compelling cricket writer for the Sydney Morning Herald as well as a commentator for the ABC, and the tributes paid to him this week by both organisations were lavish.

"A magnificent analyst and writer on the game," declared ABC boss Mark Scott.

"An extremely gifted cricket writer," said Greg Hywood, CEO of Fairfax.

And that much is true. But many of the testimonials written by Fairfax and ABC commentators went further, giving Roebuck a fine character reference while avoiding any mention of perhaps its greatest stain -- and of a possible explanation for a death.

Take Sydney Morning Herald and Melbourne Age writer Greg Baum: "He was a loyal friend who felt the pain of others as acutely as only the highly intelligent do."

The only hint of Roebuck's old shame and last anguish was this: "He fought to reconcile himself to his flaws, and it was the central drama of his life. He was tormented as only genius can be. The circumstances of his death attest to it."

But the only hint of one possible "torment" was again flattering: "But he perhaps found his life's work in South Africa, where he created a community of 40 under-privileged South African and Zimbabwean boys and spent pretty much every cent he earned putting them through school."

The facts around Roebuck's fatal jump were given just a couple of paragraphs, deep in the news, and buried under more kind eulogies.

The ABC's Tim Lane, a warm man, was typical: "Through the shock and distress of his demise one delves, for succour, into the memories of the many good times." No mention of bad.

Same with the tribute by former England bowler Vic Marks. Not a word of scandal, other than this: "He could not share the demons within and tragically went the same way as another Somerset opener, Harold Gimblett. And we are left to wonder why."

We are? Well, only if we don't know the whole story.

All this evasion raises the question: Did any of those close to Roebuck suspect things about him that they have been reluctant to say?

We do not know the facts behind the latest allegation against Roebuck. We do not know if his abuse of three boys a decade ago was an aberration, long repented.

Indeed, boys he'd helped have praised him after his death. Besides, wasn't any harm he did overwhelmed by the help he gave? All these are good points in defence of the media tributes to Roebuck.

But how generous is this same media when the subject is not a journalist, but a priest?
 

Latest posts

Top