What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Peter V'landys - New NRL/ARLC Chairman

BlueandGold

Juniors
Messages
1,203


Would love to know how you came to the estimate of 1billion knowing the AFL deal seen an uplift from 414m to 473m?

AFL revenue was 856m without Government grant.

944m - 88m as per the Chief financial officer of the AFL.

1707020684095.png


Add in the uplift of 58m from Broadcast rights in 2023 and you don't get anywhere near 1billion.

And the AFL broadcast rights where not affected in 2022 as per the financial report.

1707020887592.png

So again how did you come to 1billion estimate?
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,598
Would love to know how you came to the estimate of 1billion knowing the AFL deal seen an uplift from 414m to 473m?

AFL revenue was 856m without Government grant.

944m - 88m as per the Chief financial officer of the AFL.

View attachment 83848


Add in the uplift of 58m from Broadcast rights in 2023 and you don't get anywhere near 1billion.

And the AFL broadcast rights where not affected in 2022 as per the financial report.

View attachment 83849

So again how did you come to 1billion estimate?
The Covid reduction was still in play in 2022 for afl. Their media money is likely to have gone up from 396 to around 450 cash. I expect their revenue to be nearer $950mill but depends how marvel has performed i suppose.

very good result for nrl given low uplift in media deal.
 

The_Wookie

Bench
Messages
3,261
Would love to know how you came to the estimate of 1billion knowing the AFL deal seen an uplift from 414m to 473m?

AFL revenue was 856m without Government grant.

944m - 88m as per the Chief financial officer of the AFL.

Yeah it should be 856 for last year without the grant.

View attachment 83848


Add in the uplift of 58m from Broadcast rights in 2023 and you don't get anywhere near 1billion.

its almost like I expect other growth, like from commercial, membership and attendance. They did have something of a record year there, particularly in Victoria where the AFL does actually benefit financially.

And the AFL broadcast rights where not affected in 2022 as per the financial report.

In addition to the TV and Telstra rights, in September 2022 Media rights agreements were also negotiated for radio for 2023-2024.

actually it says they were improved, not unaffected. The COVID discounts ended during the 2022 year.

View attachment 83849

So again how did you come to 1billion estimate?

2021-2022 the AFL had revenue growth of 63m in 2021 without a new rights deal, and 117m in 2022

Marvel will have had a bigger year last year than it did the year before - average AFL crowds alone last year were up 20% at the venue, and the league collects all the revenue from the venue, including parking. Then theres about 64m in increased Radio and tv rights, and whatever lift there might be in increased commercial returns. The league gets bonuses from the MCG for attendance as well as other signage and pourage revenues, and has 65,000 AFL members of its own at the MCG, as well as 5,000 Access One members at Docklands.

And yes I can see it getting around 1 billion, probably just under. I could be wrong, but Im comfortable with my estimate.
 

BlueandGold

Juniors
Messages
1,203
The Covid reduction was still in play in 2022 for afl. Their media money is likely to have gone up from 396 to around 450 cash. I expect their revenue to be nearer $950mill but depends how marvel has performed i suppose.

very good result for nrl given low uplift in media deal.

''The Covid reduction was still in play in 2022 for afl''

No it was not.

Stop the lies.

1707024660603.png

So again how did he come to a prediction of 1trillion?
 
Last edited:

Iamback

Referee
Messages
20,321
The Covid reduction was still in play in 2022 for afl. Their media money is likely to have gone up from 396 to around 450 cash. I expect their revenue to be nearer $950mill but depends how marvel has performed i suppose.

very good result for nrl given low uplift in media deal.

Let's see what the TV brought in. The growth would suggest that you were wrong about the actual figure
 

The_Wookie

Bench
Messages
3,261
''The Covid reduction was still in play in 2022 for afl''

I havent seen that it wasnt in play anywhere. Again, he said improved. You pulled "not affected" out your ass.

EVERY announcement said it was a three year reduction from 2020-2022. Maybe the AFL did a deal to cop the reductions in year 1 and 2, but the 2022 revenue should still be higher than it is if it wasnt affected at all.

1707026662110.png


No it was not.

Stop the lies.

Dude you flat out invented words and context not even there.

So again how did he come to a prediction of 1trillion?

Reasoning supplied in previous post.
 

BlueandGold

Juniors
Messages
1,203
Dude you flat out invented words and context not even there.

No Perth red literally said that in his post.

The Covid reduction was still in play in 2022 for afl. Their media money is likely to have gone up from 396 to around 450 cash. I expect their revenue to be nearer $950mill but depends how marvel has performed i suppose.

very good result for nrl given low uplift in media deal.

Broadcasting deal for the AFL did not include inflation rises like the new deal does.

So that graph you linked proves i was correct.

The AFL in 2022 was back to normal broadcasting revenue.

And by the way your reasoning for how you got to 1 trillion is comedy Gold.

Even Perth Red thinks it will be closer to 950m than 1trillion.

My guess is 935m.

NRL 96m increase in revenue.
AFL predicted decrease of 10m in revenue.


1707029684401.png


''Maybe'' the AFL did a deal to cop the reductions in year 1 and 2, but the 2022 revenue should still be higher than it is if it wasnt affected at all.

Mate you really are pissing into the wind. hahahaha
 
Last edited:

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,741
BUZZ: You’re a busy man running Racing NSW and the NRL. How long can you keep doing two such high pressure jobs.

PVL: It could never be any worse than it was during Covid. The hours I put in … I don’t know how I did it myself. It was a lot of work and a lot of stress. It’s nowhere near as work intensive now. I’ve got a very good CEO at the NRL. I can monitor things rather than be hands-on.

BUZZ:I want to ask you about Andrew Abdo. He’s got his critics. He’s been kicked a bit over the last six months. The RLPA dispute. You had to come in and fix it. Last week, you had to step in and sort out the clubs and their problem with Vegas. Is he doing a good job?

PVL: Andrew Abdo is one of the best CEOs I’ve ever worked with. Andrew is trying to do his best for rugby league at all times. His intention is right, but he gets into arguments with people. It’s easy for me to come in at the end after all the arguments. The emotion has taken over the common sense. You take the emotion away, compromise a little bit, and get a deal done. By the time I get there, they’re fatigued. That’s what chairs are for – to come in and assist with the process. We all have weaknesses. I certainly do. Andrew needs to work on those areas he’s not strong on. But the game is very fortunate to have him.

BUZZ: NRL finances. You’re building a nice asset base. A resort on the Sunshine Coast, a hotel in Cronulla and a restaurant/hotel in Brisbane. This is impressive, especially as other sports like the A-League and rugby union are on their knees.

PVL: When Covid hit we had no assets. We were months off not being able to pay our bills. With no assets you can’t borrow any money. Lending institutions want security. If we get another emergency we don’t want to go through the stress and drama to survive. The RLPA and the clubs have been great partners in both agreeing in this cycle to have $300m worth of assets. We’re united. In 10 years, I hope it’s well in excess of a $1 billion. That’s what we’re aiming for. We’ve got a hotel strategy and we’re looking at another big one. We’ve got some brilliant business minds involved in the game.

BUZZ: It’s great to have all this money, but I worry about bush footy. Wagga was once a great rugby league town. Laurie Daley’s team in Junee has fallen over. Can we pump some of this investment money into the bush.

PVL: I grew up in country rugby league. There was a real buzz about it. We want to get back to that. People tell me it’s not necessarily money, but people migrating out of country towns. I don’t buy that. I’m looking at it now. We’ve developed a new organisation call Participation Australia to look after the entire country. I’m also looking at some direct funding for some of the country clubs. The NSWRL and QRL run the competitions, but they don’t fund the clubs. I want to change that. Even money for registrations, insurance, footballs and jumpers.

One of the things we’ve previously dropped the ball on is schools. We’ve put on a lot of new development officers to get the relationship back with schools. To their credit, the AFL had a strategy where they did a major investment in schools well.

BUZZ: You’ve achieved so much as an administrator but there’s one thing you haven’t got over the line – funding for Sydney’s suburban grounds. Shark Park holds 13,000. Can you please do something about it.

PVL: We’ve done better than what we get credit for. The previous government reneged on $800m but gave us $500m – $300m for Penrith and the rest for centres of excellence.

I think the new premier (Chris Minns) is as good a person as I’ve met in politics. He’s a very impressive guy. And a can-do man. He’s got a budget repair job at the moment, which he’s trying to fix. But I’ve told him point-blank we need money for Shark Park, at the very minimum for a centre of excellence. He’s got other priorities, but we’ll get there.

BUZZ: This time every year we run the story that we’re going to move the grand final out of Sydney.

PVL: The grand final is our greatest asset. Every state in Australia wants it. So you’ve got to look at selling it. You’ve known me for a long time … I don’t bluff. My job is to make sure the game gets as much revenue and profit as we can.

BUZZ: What about the next TV deal. It’s not up until 2027, but I’m sure you’re already thinking about it. I saw last year Channel 7 wants Origin.

PVL: Free to air is not where we get our main source of revenue. It comes from subscription television.

The way people are watching sport is changing quickly and they are moving away from traditional TVs to other devices and subscribe to the content they want to watch.

The product fee sport we receive will depend on the subscriptions and the advertising from those platforms.

 

The_Wookie

Bench
Messages
3,261
No Perth red literally said that in his post.

I literally quoted your post.

Broadcasting deal for the AFL did not include inflation rises like the new deal does.

You are absolutely guessing at this point.

So that graph you linked proves i was correct.

No it doesnt, but im sure you can spin what you like to fit whatever cockamime bullshit you feel is a better theaory than anyone elses.

The AFL in 2022 was back to normal broadcasting revenue.

No it clearly wasnt in line with expected revenue. It should NOT be lower than 2019 at normal levels in 2022. Thats not how AFL broadcast revenue has ever worked. As seen on the f**king graph.

And by the way your reasoning for how you got to 1 trillion is comedy Gold.

And youve got even less basis for you guess work.

Even Perth Red thinks it will be closer to 950m than 1trillion.

yes its amazing how you believe Perth Red all of the sudden.

My guess is 935m.

Based on what

NRL 96m increase in revenue.
AFL predicted decrease of 10m in revenue.

lol decrease in revenue based on what exactly.

Mate you really are pissing into the wind. hahahaha

mate we are all speculating here.

Ill estimate whatever the hell I want based on my interpretation of how the afl operates, just like you are. And if Im wrong, Im wrong. We'll know next month.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,598
No Perth red literally said that in his post.



Broadcasting deal for the AFL did not include inflation rises like the new deal does.

So that graph you linked proves i was correct.

The AFL in 2022 was back to normal broadcasting revenue.

And by the way your reasoning for how you got to 1 trillion is comedy Gold.

Even Perth Red thinks it will be closer to 950m than 1trillion.

My guess is 935m.

NRL 96m increase in revenue.
AFL predicted decrease of 10m in revenue.


View attachment 83853




Mate you really are pissing into the wind. hahahaha
You sound like you don’t understand how they account cash component of tv deals these days? Their deal was an avg of $416mill. We know $16mill a year was contra. That leaves an avg of $400mill cash. The way it works is it starts lower and goes up around 2-3% a year to get an avg of $400mill. Across lifespan of the deal.

So by end of their last tv deal ie 2022 it would have been ,if not covid effected, around $420mill cash. It was actually $396mill cash so around $24 mill less than should have been. You can clearly see where it starts and how it increased year on year for 17-19 and would have kept increasing to around $420mill by year 22.
 
Last edited:

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,598
Ohh controversial, Vlandys thinks there's too many teams in Sydney!

On the Bears:
'They can’t be stand-alone in Sydney because there’s too many already.'
 
Messages
15,443

I read their "conditions" over on Fox Sports https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nr...n/news-story/bcb6a2f32f3febf6200160ee5676fbc9). It quoted the Bears as saying the side had to be called "bears", use the bears logo, have 2-4 games at North Sydney Oval, and use the Bears colour scheme

Quite frankly, the 2-4 games at North Sydney Oval is the killer when you consider NRL sides get around 12 home games a year. Just putting more regular season games back in Sydney, to me, is counter-productive. It's why I think the Bears re-admission to the NRL won't ever happen.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,741
I read their "conditions" over on Fox Sports https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nr...n/news-story/bcb6a2f32f3febf6200160ee5676fbc9). It quoted the Bears as saying the side had to be called "bears", use the bears logo, have 2-4 games at North Sydney Oval, and use the Bears colour scheme

Quite frankly, the 2-4 games at North Sydney Oval is the killer when you consider NRL sides get around 12 home games a year. Just putting more regular season games back in Sydney, to me, is counter-productive. It's why I think the Bears re-admission to the NRL won't ever happen.
It’ll be two nrl games max

four games includes trials and preseason
 

shewi6

Juniors
Messages
580
It’ll be two nrl games max

four games includes trials and preseason
If they come in and where ever they are based, nrl games at nso should be zero, that should be a non negotiable. Guaranteed atleast 1 preseason game a year is fair.

If they were smart and another team could work with them, then my preference would be to organise with the nrl to have a game every year against manly at the sfs and turn it into a blockbuster ala the anzac and good friday games and aim for 30k+ each game.

Have this as part of a 3 game sydney membership against teams at the sfs and ensure it happens every year, and it should be plenty to re-engage old bears fans and keep the credibility for the expansion area whilst restoring the history of an old club.
 
Top