As the controlling body of rugby league in Queensland, the QRL constitution explicitly requires them to: “foster, develop, extend, govern and control directly and indirectly the Game in Queensland from junior and school levels to elite levels”. I'm sure the NSWRL has a similar mission in their state.
With this being at the very core of their existence, we can be assured that these bodies will always be working for the benefit of the game as a whole. The question is are NRL clubs driven by the same set of core beliefs? Is having the infrastructure of the sport - players, junior pathways and financing being run through those clubs an ideal scenario? What checks and balances exist to ensure they will foster the game as a whole?
To me the design of this system is to set up for Sydney clubs, who have low junior numbers and want to carve out semi-fiefdoms in regional areas, suck out pokie money and cherry pick the best juniors. If a few regional clubs fall away in the process that is 'progress'. Quite likely the NRL also want to run State of Origin themselves, and remove the state bodies entirely so they can turn it into the international all-stars game they are seemingly dreaming of. They already control international football and have shrunk the World Cup.
We also get sold the myth of 'the fans want reserve grade' by their News Ltd propaganda arm. Which any rational observer knows would bring maybe fifty extra fans to the game - which would be played some three hours earlier mind you (good luck for the 6pm Friday game).
Hopefully, V'Landys and Abdo are realising they can't mess with the Queensland Cup or State of Origin. Two massive Rugby League successes that were accomplished in spite of Sydney incompetence and arrogance. That's why they are backing away from the legal proceedings. They are already looking to settle. But it should not have come to this. If they try again then they will get one hell of a fight.