- Messages
- 100,946
Evergreen said:Personally I think his credibility is of an extremely high order....;-)
34 points?
:|
Evergreen said:Personally I think his credibility is of an extremely high order....;-)
skeepe said:Why not? The Eels and Tigers both put 50 on you and not a lot has changed in the team, except for the loss of Lolesi and Anasta.
i think the nrl world is sick of hearing that.dodge said::|
That team was missing Hazem El Masri, Brent Sherwin, Sonny Bill Williams, Luke Patten plus about 10 reserve graders who normally would cover those spots sufficiently.
effnic said:i think the nrl world is sick of hearing that.
dodge said::|
That team was missing Hazem El Masri, Brent Sherwin, Sonny Bill Williams, Luke Patten plus about 10 reserve graders who normally would cover those spots sufficiently.
skeepe said:Cry me a river. The Raiders had many more players out yet still managed to remain competitive apart from round 25 against the Eels, although even then we were competitve for half the match.
skeepe said:You know what I mean by competitive you pillock. I mean we at least put an effort in. We beat the minor premiers at home, and came close to the premiers and runners up. Conversely, the dogs didn't even show up to most matches. Yes the result is the same, but you can't question the heart of the Raiders players. The same cannot be said for the Bulldogs.
Red and Blue Knight said:Bye vs Covell
Bye 40
Covell 2
Red and Blue Knight said:Bye vs Covell
Bye 40
Covell 2
dodge said:29-22 victory over the frontrunners in Round 20, and earlier in the season defeating Parramatta, coming within 60 seconds of beating Brisbane the first time, defeats of Melbourne, the list goes on. A six week period where we started OK and fell away in most games isn't a "club crisis" like you make it out to be. Missing a chunk of playmakers in the arse end of the season is a bit different to lacking some forwards in the early parts. Patten, El Masri, Tonga, Sherwin, Williams and Utai all missing at some point in the final six weeks, playing with a sub-standard backline that was given one game to gel before being reshuffled?
Give me a break. We did superbly well under the circumstances for the first 20 weeks. Again, you go for perennial bottom-feeders and you have the hide to criticise my club?
skeepe said:Absolutely I do. Premiers to 12th in 12 months, the stats do not lie. Need I remind you that your "glorious" club only finished 1 point ahead of my "perennial bottom-feeders"? And only 3 points away from the spoon?
skeepe said:Who cares about injuries? If you want to blame injuries, then the Knights and the Raiders have more of a case than your pathetic excuse for a team.