Documents obtained by Capital Brief provide key insights into one of the biggest and most complex government funding deals for Australian professional sport.
Bureaucrats working on the Australian government's $600 million deal to fund the NRL's expansion into Papua New Guinea questioned the policy rationale for the move and whether a lack of transparency would put taxpayer funds at risk.
Documents obtained by
Capital Brief under freedom of information laws also show that officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade in March last year queried whether the
Peter V'Landys-led Australian Rugby League Commission would be best placed to administer the funding, and flagged several unusual aspects to what was then still a proposal.
“Typically grant programs are developed using policy objectives/criteria (in accordance with the grant guidelines) to protect core Commonwealth principles, namely achieving value with relevant money and transparency of taxpayer funding expenditure,” department officials wrote on a presentation slide titled “other funding considerations”.
“It is not immediately clear what those policy objectives/criteria would be and if the ARLC [Australian Rugby League Commission] is best placed as the delivery partner. Non-competitive grants of this scale would involve additional obligations including service standard requirements, payments being linked to completion of milestones, reporting obligations (including visibility of [how] taxpayer funds are being spent),” it continued.
Anyone else access the rest?
Documents obtained by Capital Brief provide key insights into one of the biggest and most complex government funding deals for Australian professional sport.
www.capitalbrief.com