Yeah I’d take any of them over Clifford crying and crapping his pants for us again. Gamble in particular has been the best player in a finals game and Clifford has never made a real contribution to a win that has mattered, ever. Tyson’s just had a horror injury run.
It’s just a weird article but no I don’t think many of those players have gone on to massively bigger & better things or done anything to drive winning, besides Barnett who was oddly left out. That’s like legit the only guy on the list besides Kiraz who’s gone from nothing/okay with us to a top top player who drives winning. Ultimately the issue isn’t the turnover in squad filler, which happens at every club. I’d take Josh King back for example because he’s reliable and can do a job but I don’t think he actually got massively better at Melbourne, as controversial as I’m sure that take is.
It’s just a weird article but no I don’t think many of those players have gone on to massively bigger & better things or done anything to drive winning, besides Barnett who was oddly left out. That’s like legit the only guy on the list besides Kiraz who’s gone from nothing/okay with us to a top top player who drives winning. Ultimately the issue isn’t the turnover in squad filler, which happens at every club. I’d take Josh King back for example because he’s reliable and can do a job but I don’t think he actually got massively better at Melbourne, as controversial as I’m sure that take is.