Poore wants to leave

[Hurriflatch]

Poore is IMPROVING but I wouldn't say he is playing well.

Fui apparently missed the test because of injury if it was to keep him out of the Manly game, then Mannah deserves to start ahead of Poore.

If Shackleton was fit I wouldn't even have Poore in the top 17.

Improving - Yes
playing well - Not really, but getting there Bulldogs game was a HUGE step forward
worth the $$$ he is being paid - HELL NO


He may well turn it around especially now that he knows his piss poor early season form has cost him his sky blue jersey, and if he does start playing to the level expected I will admit as such but right now, if he left I wouldn't lose any sleep.

 

[The EELiminator]

Greg Bird apparently wanted out of the Titans a couple weeks ago and that turned into a crock of sh*te. :roll:

well of course it did look who reported it :lol:

 

[Stagger eel]

if he really wants to go I hope we don't stand in his way, he can leave at the end of the year without a payout and he should decide as soon as possible so that we can find a replacement.

 

[ParraMatt]

So if he leaves does that mean we have another $300,000+ to spend in next years cap?

 

[Hurriflatch]

if he really wants to go I hope we don't stand in his way, he can leave at the end of the year without a payout and he should decide as soon as possible so that we can find a replacement.

It would've been nice if he had decided last week, before Mateo and Inu signed with the Warriors.

I don't want this to sound like I'm bashing Poore because I'd have the same reaction if any of the big money players did this but if Poore does in 2-3 weeks annouce he is going at the end of the year he shouldn't be picked in first grade again. Not because he is leaving but because him being theoretically under contract problably cost the side at least one of Mateo and Inu if not both.

 

[FUIFUI_MOIMOI]

Tolman, Cronk and O'Donnell - come on down.

 

[fish eel]

if he really wants to go I hope we don't stand in his way, he can leave at the end of the year without a payout and he should decide as soon as possible so that we can find a replacement.

we should only let him go if we can get a replacement lined up.

 

[Stagger eel]

So if he leaves does that mean we have another $300,000+ to spend in next years cap?

one of 2 things need happen..

* he and the club choose to terminate the contract without a payout.

* if another club is willing to buy out te contract..

if he wants to go we shouldn't be made to payout his contract beyond this year.

 

[Stagger eel]

we should only let him go if we can get a replacement lined up.

I think we'd be capable enough to find a replacement if he decides very early that he wants to part ways with the club.

 

[fanaticeel]

How are we going to blame brian smith for this one, i wonder?

It's actually the supercoach's fault....

 

[fish eel]

I think we'd be capable enough to find a replacement if he decides very early that he wants to part ways with the club.

True, but any release should be conditional on, as you said above no payout to free up the cap space and that we can get a replacement in.

If either there would be a payout, or we cant get quality in, he stays.

 

[Stagger eel]

It would've been nice if he had decided last week, before Mateo and Inu signed with the Warriors.

I don't want this to sound like I'm bashing Poore because I'd have the same reaction if any of the big money players did this but if Poore does in 2-3 weeks annouce he is going at the end of the year he shouldn't be picked in first grade again. Not because he is leaving but because him being theoretically under contract problably cost the side at least one of Mateo and Inu if not both.

the timing is sh*thouse no doubt about it. but there's nothing worse than keeping a bloke at the club who doesn't want to be here, Ossie, DA and Mossy should pull him into the office first thing tomorrow and put the hard word onto him and tell him he has 2 weeks to decide what he wants to do and that we won't be paying him out if he chooses to leave.

 

[Stagger eel]

True, but any release should be conditional on, as you said above no payout to free up the cap space and that we can get a replacement in.

If either there would be a payout, or we cant get quality in, he stays.

the pay-out clause should be non negotiable...we shouldn't have to pay him out...he pisses off without a cent.

 

[Delboy]

Stagger, so true, I am so ticked off with these prima donnas, boo f***ing hoo, harden up you blouse.

These knobs wonder why they don't get paid as much as they think they should, then they can't even fulfill a friggin contract

If it is true then he needs a good mirror to look into. If you remember, at the start of the season he was carrying on like the move was the best thing he did.

Anyway, ket us know doughboy and we can find a replacement, what a big sook, next he will be on MasterChef crying into his tea towel.

Still , it was Danny Dribbler

 

[UnderDawgg]

Hannant Saga Episode 2

Poore by name
Poor by game

 

[DaSuperHero2]

this rumour has been there since rd 1

 

[parra-all-the-way]

he is one of the higest paid forwards at our club, and playing off THE BENCH! doesn't that tell you something. He has gone form an origin front rower to a bench warmer, why would he be happy. I'm not saying its not deserved, just saying i wouldnt be happy with where i have gone in 12 months if that happened to me.

 

[Hellsy]

:lol: :lol: at everyone bagging him for wanting out when no-one actually knows if it is what he wants :lol: :lol:

 

[BissyB]

heard a rumour that it was said on 2UE Poore was released to the dogs? can anyone confirm?

 

[84 Baby]

according to Weidler on 9

pretty poor form if true seeing we've just let players go because of the cap

this rumour has been there since rd 1

People should really look at who's reporting it. Weidler's exclusives tend to come out 3 months after everyone else already knows about it