- Messages
- 1,720
I actually think that this can be effective fixed quick smart.
ALL national RL bodies should have a democratic structure that is created along some level of formal guidelines that the RLIF draws up. As part of such democratic structure there should be regulations on inclusion AND exclusion from competitions/affiliations. All national teams (branding/logo's)should also be owned by the RLIF and essentially held in a form of trust. Thus taking away the possibility of someone splitting so easily. The identity of the team can also be transferred to another federation if one is excluded from membership. All federations that refuse would then automatically be excluded from the RLIF and all is formal competitions.
THUS if the AMNRL refused to become democratic and open than they would lose the right to play internationally. If they refused applications for inclusion from teams without due course that would also threaten their affiliation.
At the end of the day, the only carrot (and it is a BIG one) the AMNRL hold is Tomahawk representation.
I do have one question for USARL people. IF the AMNRL decided to restructure along the lines of what has been suggested here (democratic involvement etc) would you reenter it and drop present branding (USARL) or now that there has been alot of effort go into the USARL brand (arguably it is more populat already - as can be seen on facebook) would you insist that some form of USARL branding be retained somewhere?
ALL national RL bodies should have a democratic structure that is created along some level of formal guidelines that the RLIF draws up. As part of such democratic structure there should be regulations on inclusion AND exclusion from competitions/affiliations. All national teams (branding/logo's)should also be owned by the RLIF and essentially held in a form of trust. Thus taking away the possibility of someone splitting so easily. The identity of the team can also be transferred to another federation if one is excluded from membership. All federations that refuse would then automatically be excluded from the RLIF and all is formal competitions.
THUS if the AMNRL refused to become democratic and open than they would lose the right to play internationally. If they refused applications for inclusion from teams without due course that would also threaten their affiliation.
At the end of the day, the only carrot (and it is a BIG one) the AMNRL hold is Tomahawk representation.
I do have one question for USARL people. IF the AMNRL decided to restructure along the lines of what has been suggested here (democratic involvement etc) would you reenter it and drop present branding (USARL) or now that there has been alot of effort go into the USARL brand (arguably it is more populat already - as can be seen on facebook) would you insist that some form of USARL branding be retained somewhere?