Yes, and then I get stirred up. Where will it end?
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Yes, and then I get stirred up. Where will it end?
No, mate. He was better than that.
There's too many of them.
So we are in agreement no more Smith's or Arthur's
I thought Cini was the best player on the field and Yates was safe.
He is a strong defender with playmaking skills. That fits the job description for hookers.
yeah Cini was good .... but again - dunno if its as much 2nd grade opposition as anything ..... I thought the Penrith centre ranga was well regarded - but Cini ran round him like he wasn't there
No it's guys who can play multiple positions. They help cover injuries during a game, but you don't need one on the bench if you have them in the starting side. The whole bench can be used to give merkins a breather.
Hodgson is the dummy half and should be free to try to set up tries at the line, regardless of what the halves want. Blaming his decision to throw a risky pass on your favoured scapegoat exposes your intellectual dishonesty. Greig had both halves outside him and threw the ball twenty metres behind them. Again, his fault.
In a scrappy game where outside backs were the top performers I didn't read too much into it either way. The sky isn't falling, much as you and the media would like to portray it that way.
My point is that whether he plays first grade or not in any given week, it's all justifiable. You won't hear me pretending I know more than the coaching staff. But if you start f**ken whinging about selections again, I will be reminding you and the rest of you whingers how little you know.
I would've thought it was obvious. Gutherson is a utility, and fullbacks are pretty easy to find.
It's so easy to put merkins through gaps. Crazy there were only five LBAs in the game yesterday. Penrith's halves had zero of them!
Every team needs plodders, and they're cheaper if they're local.
I thought he played about 60, but yes he was solid.
They're must keep if they fit into your culture because they are good value under the cap. You will gain no benefit from replacing them in your squad. Spend the extra money somewhere else.
Isn't that exactly what he did yesterday? It was essentially a NSW Cup trial and he played fullback.
Yes we do. If these more experienced merkins all get picked in first grade there will be no room for Dunster or Russell:
More importantly why isn't he in our (or any other) top 30? I struggle to see why he isn't in the top 510 players in the game. I guess if I knew more than five-eighths of f**k all I'd be able to figure it out. He outplayed Russell (and most other players) in reserve grade last year. Maybe he only likes playing against nuffies?
Even at full strength the top 30 doesn't fill the NRL and reserve grade sides. There will always be merkins outside the top 30 playing NSW Cup.
What sample size over the years?
