Prematurely Shooting Your ... ?

[Timmah]

As it seems that you can't understand analogies, lets do it your way and talk about traffic volumes then. I'll keep it really simple for you. These are the traffic comparisons between the threads in question...
Knights forum match thread (with JMs post): Posts - 134 Views - 2,369
NRL forum Dogs/Roosters match thread (with Timmahs post): Posts - 158 Views - 3,983
This thread (with my post): Posts - 93 Views - 1,772

As the figures suggest, there isn't a huge difference in the traffic volumes, so your bird doesn't fly, sunshine.
Again, regardless of the traffic or intended audience, an open forum is an open forum, full stop. If JM wants to conceal his hypocrisy if future, then he should either post his comments in a closed private forum or not make them in the first place.

:lol:!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Golden. 2,369 views in the Knights forum would be 95 or more % Knights fans. The other 5% of views would be trolls like yourself in there looking for trouble.

The 3,983 views (despite your protests, a difference in views of more than 1,600 is a "huge" one, btw) in the Roosters/Dogs thread are clearly from a much larger cross-section of members, as evidenced by the posts throughout the thread.

Your total lack of common sense would really be quite tragic, if it wasn't so laughable.
I've gone over this several times now and I don't care how many of your intellectually challenged friends agree with you, facts are facts.

Even funnier are your pathetic attempts to save your sinking ship by lying that I go into opposition forums post-game to pick on people. Never let the facts get in the way of a good story, eh Timmah.
Either provide the evidence, prick or stfu.

What is clearly gutless and indicative of the characters of you and your like, is that you think that you can hide in your little club forums and say whatever you like about other clubs or teams, expecting not be challenged. You and your friends are the ones who should lighten up and not take yourselves so seriously, princess... you're just not that important.

lying that you go into opposition forums post-game to pick on people? :lol: You did it last week when you beat us and you've backed it up this week by trawling the Knights forum for similar remarks. Facts have been evidenced, you brought them out into the open forum yourself.

Regardless of your thoughts on who belongs where when it comes to club forums, just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD. Stick to bashing other clubs' fans in the "open" NRL forum. Doing it in club forums is grade-A trolling.

 

[RockWheel]

Its term I often use when talking to little girls like you lot.... btw, maybe you should try getting to a "level" first before thinking about sinking to one, Albert.

You talk to little girls?

 

[Tom Ace]

You talk to little girls?

 

[Didgi]

:lol:

Its term I often use when talking to little girls like you lot.... btw, maybe you should try getting to a "level" first before thinking about sinking to one, Albert.

I should try getting to a level? I'm sorry, I dont speak idiot. Kindly explain what your dribble is trying to tell me this time, 'princess'.

I've answered it several times in this thread already... pity you can't read, moron. Whats even funnier is watching all you little fellas squirm and circle jerk in here. :lol:

Oh dear dear dear. You really do like the idea of group masturbation dont you. Does this tie in at all with your 'princess' statements? I heard you Souffs fans were a bit backward.

You've answered the questions already in this thread? :lol: You coulld be a comedian as well.

Here's the questions douchebag, just in case you forgot them.

Posted by Johns Magic HERE
Tell me, would you expect to have opposition fans come into the Souths forum and berate you after a loss if you'd said you had a good feeling about the game to other Souths fans beforehand? Why or why not.

Now tell me, would you expect to be berated by opposition fans after a loss if you'd been gloating about how much your team was going to win by in the NRL section? Why or why not.