millersnose
Post Whore
- Messages
- 65,223
carcharias said:I think I like this Hammo character.
perhaps he can take reefies place in your life
carcharias said:I think I like this Hammo character.
millersnose said:i dismiss them because like the selectors and national coach i agree that noddy is the best choice
i did no such thing
millersnose said:lol
ricky spends half a mil of a bench hooker
and david gillespie was a prop for canterbury...so what?
millersnose said:lol
ricky spends half a mil of a bench hooker
millersnose said:perhaps he can take reefies place in your life
cheese said:Maybe you base your judgment on try assists combined with winning percentage then
Mona's = 100%
Orford = 71%
Dobson = 50%
Kimmorley = 42%
Looks like the try assist stat you always resort to is just a cover up for a festering kimmorley fetish. Otherwise you would unbiasly apply the same logic to better performing NSW halves
millersnose said:wtf?
if winning percentages was what rep sides were picked on then darren lockyer and minichielo would not be rep players
you guys really do scrape the bottom of the barrell
perhaps the selectors and national coach all have this supposed kimmorley fetish
ormaybe...just maybe cheese
consider this for a moment...maybe it is you who have got it wrong
cheese said:It's alright mini-mil
I'm sure daddy can fight his own battles
cheese said:Well if they aren't selected on winning.
and uhm ..they're not selected on try assists which is a relfection of good play
What are they selected on!?!?
OH THATS RIGHT ....they're selected on half baked media hype and reputation
The stats tell a different story. They tell an unbiased story with no media influence.
lol what crap.millersnose said:no but nods side is doing ok
nobut nods is doingf ok in that stat
their entire game
didnt you know that?
if you want to beleive that and it makes your dissappointment easier to swallow be my guest
I agree. Seeing our side play without kimmorley is something that stats alone can't explain. We just "flow"stats do not tell the entire story
spider said:geez guys - dont you fella's have anything???
because i share the same opinion as someone else - lol
it only hi-lights your lack of substance
fair game hey carch, i can safely assume you have no objection to threads being bumped with pictures in them?
cheese said:lol what crap.
Perennial under-performers like brett finch have also played halfback for the blues.
Pennial under-peformers like brett finch have also been the preferred option over brett kimmorley.
Are you saying Brett Finch's entire game is better than a Matt Orford, or Gower ....or f**k ...even Kimmorley?
Many things come into consideration when rep teams are selected, and sadly, form is rarely one of them. I say this because you seem to be parading noddies selection as some sublime form indicator.
I agree. Seeing our side play without kimmorley is something that stats alone can't explain. We just "flow"
i know you areI know exactly what you are talking about.
cheese said:Pennial under-peformers like brett finch have also been the preferred option over brett kimmorley.