What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Put up or shut up, ASADA.

Status
Not open for further replies.

gunnamatta bay

Referee
Messages
21,084
Perrys our man Carch. He never lost a case.

actually:

http://www.perrymasontvshowbook.com/pmb_c209.htm



The truth is, Perry Mason didn't win every case. In fact, at least three decisions went against him.

Well, sort of. "The Case of the Witless Witness" begins with a judgment being handed down against Perry by judge Daniel Redmond. Perry's not trying a murder case; it's more likely a matter of civil law. Afterward, the judge even comforts Perry, suggesting he could always go to the appeals court. It turns out that judge Redmond has political aspirations and Perry later successfully defends him on an influence-peddling and murder charge.

In "The Case of the Terrified Typist," a jury returns a guilty verdict against Perry's client, giving Hamilton Burger goose bumps thinking he'd finally beaten Mason. But alas, Perry is still able to clear the defendant.

Perry's most famous "loss" occurred in "The Case of the Deadly Verdict." It's a strange episode. The show uncharacteristically opens in the courtroom. A decision is being handed down. Perry's client is found guilty of murdering her aunt for money, and is sentenced to die in the gas chamber. Stop the presses!

Or, then again, start them up. To pump up interest in this particular episode, which ran in October 1963, Gail Jackson released teasers to the press that September, the official beginning of the 1963-64 season. Foreshadowing publicity stunts to come (remember "Who Shot J.R.?"), Jackson revealed only that Perry's client would be found guilty at the beginning of the episode. As The New York Times said after reviewing the preshow hype and writing that Perry would lose: "Presumably this is the first time in six years that . . . Burr has been called upon to register surprise."

The newspaper also pointed out that the big question was, can "Perry and his client . . . reverse the circumstances just before the final commercial?"

They did.
 

Ausguy

Coach
Messages
14,887
How is that newsworthy.... we are ready to hand some papers over.... f**k get the news crew out there asap
 

Ausguy

Coach
Messages
14,887
ahhhh who expected anything today put your hand up?

Im sure the sharks didnt write our submission on a post it note. The appeal would be a large document that the nrl will need weeks to go over.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top