Big Pete
Referee
- Messages
- 29,108
I used the example of Kenny to slight the Lewis myth.
Same point applies.
Bias stirs up negative connotations. Strategic opinion, strategic inclination could be substituted here. But point is valid. Also a valid point to say Lewis was dropped because Kenny was in great form having done well in two grand finals and origin.
Just as it's valid to say he was ruled out because he couldn't pass a medical test.
He lost his spot to Kenny, it does slight the Lewis myth no matter how well you spin otherwise.
Not as significantly as you lead people to believe by saying he was dropped. Fans should be reminded of the conjecture involved and should still be aware that Lewis was on the bench and vice captain. He wasn't dropped from the team altogether.
Here's a thought for you Pete - if Lewis was merely injured in 1990 why when he returned in 1991 was he not reinstated the captaincy? When captains return from injury they normally get the C back. But don't when they have been dropped.
Because Meninga did a bang up job and had more miles in his legs left to travel.
Just like Lockyer when he took over from Johns. Was Johns dropped?
Yes - but not excuse when the Broncos have won six premierships while contributing heavily to origin. Same with the Melbourne Storm errr NULL premierships. Or the Raiders...
All six premierships had come at a time where the coach had grown accustomed to the effects of Origin, allowing him to be prepared for the adverse effects that competition would have on his side.
In the early parts, he and his players weren't as well equipped intellectually to handle the effects of Origin football on his squad. Not to the extent the Broncos had to at least.
If that was a problem it was up to Wally to sort it and manage the relationships with his team. Who was the horses mouth - the players or Wally?
The coach.
It's not as easy as you make it sound, Wally's popularity mixed with all the responsibilities he already had made it difficult.
Doesn't that really help RABK's point that Wally only contributed for Origin? (Not my point btw).
No because RABK refuses to acknowledge Lewis' 211 games in the BRL.
He did contribute to the Broncos as well, to simply state he didn't contribute a thing at club level is very misleading.
Define ability? Ability to manage relations with players? Ability to train? Ability to do the things Kevvy Walters could do? If Wally's performances had been in elite in 1990 as they had been previously - there is less likelihood he would have been canned. Simple. No matter how you spin it.
Ability on-field.
Lewis was injured through out most of 1990. How was he ever supposed to show his on-field ability on the sidelines?
The point is, you bring up his form, what had a major contribution to that form? Why was he benched? What contributed to that?
I suppose in 2008, Stagg was a far superior five eigth to Lockyer given he was benched.
Billy Moore screamed Queenslander as he played for Queensland against what team in origin?
Did Billy Moore prepare for Origin with anyone dressed in the Sky Blue?
Because its an origin thread. Cannot not have a Queensland origin team thread without a team to play against.
This is an Origin board. It doesn't take much to start up an Origin thread for the specific purpose of talking up New South Wales players.
I don't know why you would mention anybody wearing the Sky Blue in an Origin thread about Queensland.
During preparation do you think Mal gets his players to gather and pay tribute to Ray Price, Steve Mortimer and Andrew Johns?
Else its as exciting as reading the ESL Dream team. NSW are part of Origin history too - its not just ours.
Maybe to you.
Truth is this is a Queensland thread made to pay tribute to the history of the Queensland side and it's players in Origin history.
If you feel obliged to pay tribute to New South Wales players there is a button to make all those things happen.