That is the big one. Is it $1billion (if that is the figure!) for 5 years (if so great deal!) or is it $1billion for 7 years (if so terrible deal!). Also what was in the deal that might impact the value of the next FTA deal. We know Ch9 only went to $185mill because they had the option of clawing some of that ($60mill a year) back by selling Saturday and simucast back to Fox. If that is now included in the Fox deal the FTA will be worth much less. Devil will be in the detail!
Ok here are my hysterics or pie in the sky stuff ,or figures plucked out of my rear end.;
If it was Foxtel 7 years for $1bn ,that would equate to about $140m p.a.,not much more than what Nein was paying the NRL under the current deal.So I call BS on 7 years .
Reason if it was $140m pa for the remaining 5 years thats $700m in toto. Foxtel was paying NRL under current deal est $230m pa.
Then you hopefully got to flog 5 years with 9.They were paying $130m or thereabouts under current deal,
So 9 for 5 years $650M 18-22
Foxtel for years$1,150M 18-22
Total roughly $1.8BN 2018-2022
So even if they (Nein) paid the same no chance w plus you throw in digital FWIW $50m max ?????,thats $180M pa or $900m for 5 years in toto.
So you have Foxtel for 5 years $700m
Nine for 5 years. $180m pa $900m (which I call BS because Foxtel is always much dearer.)
So for 2023-2027 total $1.6bn
You'd have to be a loon to drop nearly 40% on the next 5 year deal with Foxtel.13% reduction I could understand($230m pa to $200m pa),but I'm guessing.
I any case the reported deal Roy the Boy Masters on May 30th noted, that V'Landys has stated the Foxtel has been awarded a FIVE YEAR RENEWAL FOR AN UNDISCLOSED AMOUNT.That has been explicit, whilst the amount has not been revealed.And that has given the AFL honchos the sh*ts, because they are not able to quantify any possible bragging rights.
More so because they haven't yet struck Foxtel deals, so keep the fumblers guessing.
WTF should you publicly announce a figure you got from your major broadcaster to your major competitor, when that same competitor is yet to strike a deal with the same broadcaster.
That's Gallopesque comedy stuff. "We got $500m over 6 years, we broke an Oz sport broadcast record".
Then your competitor a couple of weeks later gets $780m over 5 years.
Talk about being rogered, reamed, screwed and hung out to dry.