0/10..must try harder.As you say though...a big win there for someone could change that, the stadium hasn't really had a signature events since it reopened has it?
0/10..must try harder.As you say though...a big win there for someone could change that, the stadium hasn't really had a signature events since it reopened has it?
0/10..must try harder.
Huh?
I'm talking between the various Soccer, League, NFL and even the couple of Union games, there is no really memorable game from the stadium yet is there?
I think as WireMan says the Club Wembley seats do damage it. I don't think you should have to queue for 20 minutes for a pint at half time like I have there, I certainly didn't experience that in other modern stadiums. Seats don't seem to hang the pitch well relative to the Millenium. Just for the chunk of change they spent on it, doesn't seem like they got everything right.
As you say though...a big win there for someone could change that, the stadium hasn't really had a signature events since it reopened has it?
I actually found the Millenium stadium a fairly standard ground. It is no better than OT, St James, Anfield, Emirates, Villa park or the Etihad of the top of my head.
That previous comment makes sense..I thought you'd gone on a troll for no apparent reason, my bad bud.Genuinely what memorable games have been there. Yeah Champions League final, FA Cup, Challenge Cup, NFL matches, few England games but none were classics or really are a signature game to remember the new Wembley and to build a new lore. I know it's early doors...I'm just saying when there is a classic game there it will be remembered.
Have to say I find that laughable.
Why?
What's so good about it that makes the suggestion that St James or OT or the emirates are better laughable?
Given that i have been to these grounds and Cardiff was not the biggest, not the best facilities, and is a total pain to get to unless you are in the middle of Cardiff, what makes it so good?
Saying Wembley is hard to get to on the tube is laughable.
And a certain poster stuck in TFC laughed at me when I said both the English and French games need a kick in the pants and an independent commission of some type themselves to get rid of self interest and the people not good enough or smart enough to see the bigger picture.
Sorry DP, that's an absolute load of wrist-slitting garbage. You seem to be a reasoned poster in other areas so I have no idea why you continue to talk about P&R, and now complaining about stag do's? Come on. The game is not perfect but this sort of backwards thinking helps nobody and hopefully will be gone from the game in a few years.
That's the point. Whether you like it or not, there are only a few teams who can compete at the top level. The teams in the Championship are nowhere near good enough, and you're deluding yourself if you think any of them would be able to even aspire to compete with the current 14 clubs. Anyway, your argument about teams constantly being at the bottom is totally unjustified. Wakefield finished below all those clubs last year, and this year have made the play-offs. Castleford have narrowly missed out on the play-offs for the last two years, and were seconds away from making it to Wembley in 2011. Again, your point about clubs having financial problems is just unsubstantiated. There are no causal factors that can be linked in any way to the licensing system and in case you hadn't noticed, there has been a global financial crisis. I dread to think what might have happened under the old system when clubs were often forced to spend and unable to properly budget. And the whole point of the licensing system is that the league is not 'ringfenced'. Widnes came up this year. All the licensing system means is that promotion and relegation is decided on the basis of logical, sustainable criteria rather than a single arbitrary factor that in no way reflects a club's potential to compete and be successful. The fact is that if any of the clubs outside Super League were stronger than the clubs currently in the league, then they would replace them. That there aren't even any serious contenders at present shows that this clearly isn't the case, and if you are advocating removing a Super League team and replacing them with what would by nature be a weaker team, then like I said that's just totally backwards. It's a shame if it is somehow ruining your enjoyment of the game, but you really need to live in the real world here. Personally I probably wouldn't really watch much Super League if promotion and relegation was still happening because it was just totally stupid and crippled the game.There are only a handful of teams that can compete at the top and that for me is boring. If you enjoy watching the same teams lift the trophies year on year then good fo you. Because there's only a handful at the top it doesn't matter who the rest are. We may as well let another dog have it's day as continually seeing London, Salford and Cas near the bottom most seasons.
Castleford have narrowly missed out on the play-offs for the last two years, and were seconds away from making it to Wembley in 2011.