ok, he's out of his depth then, unlike plenty of people here I'm not an expert at media relations so I wouldn't know, but what I saw last night was Zap deny it and Magany sticking to ger story..so someones obviously lying, but the general concesus is there we don't need a jury because everyone seems to have already made up their mind.
but hey that's cool.
Magnay wouldnt have gone to print unless she was certain her story was rock solid - she held the line well in the footy show.
Not saying Zap is lying at all - just saying I believe Magnay would be convinced her story and sources are solid.
Why wouldn't of the lady in question press charges against Zaps for attacking her/assault???
I dont think any of the reports have questioned it was an accident?
Which made Gould's questioning on that last night bizarre - banging on about these accusations about Zappia and the girl, when the only new part of the story was the 20K.
Was the $20k a pay out because her job was made redundant?
You would think a CEO could have answered that part.
Was it compensation for the injury?
Was it a redundancy?
Was it a combination of the two?