What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Raiders lose again

Messages
4,007
ozbash said:
I NEVER SEEN SO MANY IDIOTS MAKE A BIG DEAL OUT OF NOTHING!!!!!!!!!

we been trying to tell you clowns that all along, even from when you put the very first post up in the warriors forum.

this thread wont be locked, it is to be left as a flowing tribute and monument to the majority of raiders fans thin skinnedness (yes arzz there is such a word),oneeyedness and to how a bunch of losers try to rectify the onfield failings of their team? offfield.


at whatever cost.

Losers? Who the f**k do you think you are calling us losers? Poor excuse for an administrator f**k off and annoy someone else.
 

Steven Gerrard

First Grade
Messages
5,013
First a Canberra idiot claims the ref cost them the game

Hypocritical again? Cast you memory back to 2003 Raiders vs Tigers @ Canberra Stadium, shall i repeat what you idiots were saying after the game? Or do you have the ability to figure it out yourself. :lol:
 

simon says

First Grade
Messages
5,124
I love how Im a bad feller cos I had a laugh about Woolford getting one in the nuts.It happens in the cricket and everyone thinks its hilarious even players from the same teram have a larf....I saw that germ jump out of the tackle holding his nuts(going for a penalty as usual) and I thought it was bloody funny.....no one got hurt,so whats the problem.

Hardly comparible to getting the shits like yer mate Raider 2004 and saying sucked in.... your players out for the rest of the year.It came as no surprise as he is a complete poopoo head that lacks any semblance of class whatsoever.....

I would advise any Raider fan with any sense of decency and respect not to side with 2004,as it makes you look even stoopider than before.....

Cheers.
 

Steven Gerrard

First Grade
Messages
5,013
I would advise any Raider fan with any sense of decency and respect not to side with 2004,as it makes you look even stoopider than before.....

I would advise you to shut up. :lol: Raiders fans, unlike yourself, aren't so stuck up and stubborn. Therefore they are easily able to understand the meaning of my comments. You and a few others obviously can't so I don't see any reason why I should bother trying to entertain you all any longer, as the level of stupidness your at won't change to understand anything.
My final post, anything after this won't be read by me. ;-)
 

innsaneink

Referee
Messages
29,384
Raiders 2004 said:
I would advise any Raider fan with any sense of decency and respect not to side with 2004,as it makes you look even stoopider than before.....

I would advise you to shut up. :lol: Raiders fans, unlike yourself, aren't so stuck up and stubborn. Therefore they are easily able to understand the meaning of my comments. You and a few others obviously can't so I don't see any reason why I should bother trying to entertain you all any longer, as the level of stupidness your at won't change to understand anything.
My final post, anything after this won't be read by me. ;-)
In other words.....if you dont read anymore then in your pea-brain that equates to you having the last word....thus winning some argument?
Like a child that thinks if it cant see something, then that something cant see said child....LOL. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Go stick your head in the sand, ostrich!!
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
Raiders 2004 said:
First a Canberra idiot claims the ref cost them the game

Hypocritical again? Cast you memory back to 2003 Raiders vs Tigers @ Canberra Stadium, shall i repeat what you idiots were saying after the game? Or do you have the ability to figure it out yourself. :lol:


There's a big difference between what happened then and what happened against the warriors. A legit try being called no try in the last 15 seconds when a team is down by 2, is very very different. Even Davico said the ball was good. :roll: You're whinging when you lost with time to spare.
 

hybrid_tiger

Coach
Messages
11,684
simon says said:
Yeah its a halfwit for sure......


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

He doesn't even have enough wit to be a half-wit.

Raiders 2004, your incompetence is an inspiration to idiots everywhere. Keep up the good work.

;-)
 

tiger_nick

Bench
Messages
2,972
I would never send someone off against the Raiders. Those bitches fake so many penalties you never know if they are actually hurt. Boy who cried wolf anyone?
 

Trollhammaren

Juniors
Messages
2,051
Raiders 2004 said:
First a Canberra idiot claims the ref cost them the game

Hypocritical again? Cast you memory back to 2003 Raiders vs Tigers @ Canberra Stadium, shall i repeat what you idiots were saying after the game? Or do you have the ability to figure it out yourself. :lol:

Since I've already alluded to this in THIS thread you dope, I shall quote myself. Maybe I shouldn't bother, since it's doubtful you can actually read and comprehend what's being said.

tiger pride said:
I Bleed Green said:
tiger pride said:
^ Don't see what that has to do with anything, but this thread became a whinge-fest due to that Raiders guy 'I Bleed Green', I believe, claiming the ref cost Canberra the game. A pretty pathetic excuse. If you were the better team, you should have been in a position where a sh!t decision at any point (that is if it actually was incorrect) should not have affected you winning anyway. You weren't in that position, warriors win. End of story.

Hm... weren't Tigers fans in uproar last year when the referee "cost you the game" against us due to that Pearson "forward" pass?

What's the difference? You could've won the game before that point too.......

Hypocrite.

D!ckhead, I never said that cost us the game. Are all supporters of the same club ONE ENTITY? No, you fool. Of course, my logic about the Raiders/Warriors game applied to the game at Bruce last year. It was, in my eyes, an incorrect. But we fvcked up by letting you get to an early lead. 12-16 points or something. The ref didn't "COST" us the game as you claim here. Sh!t decisions are ubiquitous, but you have to expect that these days.


I never said the ref cost us the game. It was not a good call nonetheless IMO.
 

Trollhammaren

Juniors
Messages
2,051
Raiders 2004 said:
I would advise any Raider fan with any sense of decency and respect not to side with 2004,as it makes you look even stoopider than before.....

I would advise you to shut up. :lol:

Raiders 2004 is the epitome of wit!! Yes, I see the irony in that me using sarcasm.

Seriously, using about 20 of these > :lol: per post does not validate your argument, just makes you look like a juvenile idiot; which you , so carry on...
 

thickos

First Grade
Messages
7,086
tiger_nick said:
I would never send someone off against the Raiders. Those bitches fake so many penalties you never know if they are actually hurt. Boy who cried wolf anyone?

:iwstupid:

Clearly this post must have taken hours to research. I mean the logic, the structure is outstanding! :roll:

Come on then, give us an example. What exactly are you referring to? Davico getting concussed by Knee-u Knee-u? Yeah, I'm sure he was faking it then. Joel Monaghan getting pile-drived by those other two turkeys? It's a good thing he can still walk.

Maybe you're going even further back, lets say Roosters-Raiders, Round 20 last year. Morley belted McLinden around the chops, Ricky Stuart had the hide to claim Macca was milking a penalty... of course I'm sure the blood streaming from Macca's face was merely a prop, a gimmick almost! :roll:

If you're gonna make ridiculous statements like that, grow some balls and back it up with some evidence.
 

Meth

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
35,762
Well, I know he didn't do anything in your eyes and this will probably turn into another merry-go-round of Raiders whinging, but Schifcofske took a big dive in SeuSeu's tackle.

He was in critical condition until he heard the whistle :roll:
 

thickos

First Grade
Messages
7,086
And of course this only applies to Raiders players, no-one else in the league does this! :roll:
 

Meth

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
35,762
Plus, I have been constantly amused by whinging about Betham's "whinging" to Lyons, when Woolford is one of the biggest whingers in the game. He's a tantrum throwing midget
 

Meth

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
35,762
And of course this only applies to Raiders players, no-one else in the league does this!

You said it, not me

You asked for examples and you got one :clap:
 

thickos

First Grade
Messages
7,086
LOL.

This is a favourite of opposition fans - 'Woolford is a whinging so-and-so'. He is the captain of the team, he is allowed to voice his opinion to the ref. Same applied for Toovey when he was captain at Manly.

Personally I think Woolford shits the lot of you because he plays with his heart on his sleeve, which is a rarity in today's game. Nothing wrong with having a bit of emotion rather than having 34 robots face off against each other week in week out.

I think if Lyons had refereed a better game for both teams there would have been less complaints from both captains...
 
Top