What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Raiders VS Tigers *Spoiler*

simon says

First Grade
Messages
5,124
I reckon they should start drug testing some of these Raider fans,not just the players....Im sure with the shit they come up with they must be on something that is very strong....

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

tiger_nick

Bench
Messages
2,972
simon says said:
I reckon they should start drug testing some of these Raider fans,not just the players....Im sure with the sh*t they come up with they must be on something that is very strong....

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Youve gotta do something inbetween watching porn and lighting fireworks
 

simon says

First Grade
Messages
5,124
Ohhh Nick......thats disgusting,slurring all the good people of Canberra like that.

Im sure they all dont watch porn and let off firecrackers......

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

skeepe

Immortal
Messages
47,382
This thread is still going? Bloody hell. I knew Tigers fans could hold grudges, but this is ridiculous. simon says, I really can't be bothered with you anymore. You have shown yourself to be moronic, childish and stupid. I remember in another thread you claiming you had watched league for something like 30 years. Well, you act as though you've been alive for 3. Grow up man, it's getting old really quick.
 

851

Bench
Messages
3,141
WestsTigers verses Raiders 2004, a 26-12 win and 32-24 loss,net total WestsTigers 50 Raiders 44.What are you all crowing about. :?:
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
skeepe said:
This thread is still going? Bloody hell. I knew Tigers fans could hold grudges, but this is ridiculous.

That's not entirely fair. Raider's fans are giving as good as they get.
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
If you are going to be selective Raiders 2004, there's no point in posting any stats -
Schifcofske:
Line Breaks - 7
Goals - 22
Field Goals - 1
Tries - 4
Try Assists - 1
Metres Per Hitup - 8.4
Metres Gained This Season: 2655
Hitups this Season: 310
Offloads this season: 52
Errors: 15

Hodgson:
Line Breaks - 16
Field Goals - 0
Goals - 48
Tries - 7
Try Assists - 5
Metres Per Hitup - 9.4
Metres Gained This Season: 2433
Hitups this Season: 257
Offloads this season: 19
Errors: 30

Looks a lot better for Hodgson now doesn't it!
 

thickos

First Grade
Messages
7,086
Half as many errors and almost threee times the offloads for Schif. Plus more metres. He's been relinquished of the goalkicking so his tally is much lower than previous years.
So your point, again, was??? :roll:
 

Raider_69

Post Whore
Messages
61,174
30 errors!!
almost 1/3 offload
less metres
less hitups
probably more mistackles

from the looks of those stats Hodgo would be a far better option being put at 5/8th
 

Raider_69

Post Whore
Messages
61,174
My research concludes

Schifcofske made 82 missed 26 tackles

Hodgson made 51 missed 25 tackles

is defence not the primary role of a fullback..
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
If this were so Minicello wouldn't be SOO fullback.

For Hodgson, More tries, 2 1/2 times as many line breaks, 5 times the try assists. Why did schifcofske relinquish the goal kicking duties? Surely being able to kick well should add the how you rate someone as a player? More metres per hitup. To conclude Schifcofske is a better fullback relying only on the stats is a joke.
 

Raider_69

Post Whore
Messages
61,174
well schif was in terrible form with kicking
the shot clock has f**ked him royal, and gafa is a top kicker and a quick one aswell so thats why

personally as i have posted in the tigers forum, hodgson is a 5/8th trying to do his best at fullback
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
Maybe. They are different styles of fullback.

If the truth be known I wouldn't swap Hodgson for any other person playing fullback this year, and you wouldn't swap schifcofske. If Hodgson played for you you wouldn't swap him, and if schif played for us we wouldn't swap him.

There's an undeniable inherent bias on both sides. What I object to is people posting statistics yet leaving out equally important statistics that do not support their case.
 
Top