What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Raudonikis, Mortimer believe Darren Lockyer better than Andrew Johns

Perth Knights

Juniors
Messages
271
This article is bound to generate some interesting discussion about who is the better footballer - Johns or Lockyer.

For me there is no comparison:

Johns = 3 Dally M's; Lockyer = Nil
Johns was better defensively, particularly "one on one";
Johns was better offensively - had more influence over games at Club and State level;
Johns was a better all round player and he introduced many innovations to the game; and
Johns career was affected by injury particularly in the last 3 to 4 years of his career. So statistically John's would have matched Lockyer if he was not cut down prematurely by injury.

So finally ... whilst Lockyer is a great player, to me Johns was a more gifted footballer.

Look forward to your comments!

Raudonikis, Mortimer believe Darren Lockyer better than Andrew Johns
By Peter Badel
July 04, 2010
NSW and Test legends believe Darren Lockyer has dethroned Andrew Johns as the greatest player of his generation, calling for the Maroons skipper to be named an Immortal.

As Lockyer closes in on Allan Langer's State of Origin record for most appearances, former Australian halfback Tommy Raudonikis said the Queensland ace had leapfrogged Johns as the most influential NRL player of the modern era.

Former Test captain Johns has long been regarded by many as the code's finest player, with the Newcastle champion installed as halfback in the NRL's Team of the Century two years ago.

But Raudonikis is adamant Lockyer has left Johns in the shade after chalking up a glittering assortment of NRL and representative records that may never be beaten.

Lockyer's latest milestone came last week, when the veteran pivot eclipsed Cronulla icon Andrew Ettingshausen's mark of most NRL games for one club with his 329th appearance for the Broncos.

"I don't think there's any doubt Locky has gone past Joey - he's deadset smashed him into ribbons," said Raudonikis, who played 20 Tests between 1972-80 and captained NSW in the inaugural Origin clash of 1980.

"If you look at the records, he's played more first grade games, more Origin games, more Tests (than Johns) . . . he blows Joey away.

"He rates up among guys like Wally Lewis, Bob Fulton and Brett Kenny. He's made a fool of me. A year ago, I said Darren is better off retiring but champions always make you look foolish and he's just got better and better.

"He's such a wonderful competitor. I'd follow him into battle any time. He's great for the game, he doesn't sook like a lot of modern-day players.

"I'd put him ahead of Joey now, definitely."

"I don't think there's any doubt Locky has gone past Joey - he's deadset smashed him into ribbons"
- former Australian halfback Tommy Raudonikis
Statistically, Lockyer has the edge on Johns, who retired in 2007. He has played 80 more top-grade games (329 to Johns's 249), and is on course to surpass the NRL's all-time record of 349 shared by Bulldogs great Terry Lamb and Manly icon Steve Menzies.

At representative level, Lockyer has played more matches for Australia (51) than Johns's Origin and Test games combined (47). Factor in his Origin portfolio - Lockyer plays his 33rd game this Wednesday night, one shy of Langer's 34-game record - and the Brisbane legend has claims to being an NRL untouchable.

But the one blot on Lockyer's resume is his inability, thus far, to win a Dally M Medal.

By contrast, Johns has won a record three, and many believe Lockyer has never single-handedly dominated a game like the Knights legend did.

Asked to nominate his top-three players in recent times, former Blues skipper Steve Mortimer ranked Lockyer ahead of Johns, with Johnathan Thurston a distant third.

"On his day, I don't think there was anyone better than Joey. But for longevity no one can go past Locky," Mortimer said.

"Some of the players in the game today were three or four years old when Locky started in first grade. To have that longevity in the game is just unbelievable."

Last year, Clive Churchill's widow, Joyce, told The Sunday Mail Lockyer must be named the next Immortal, a stance that has been echoed by Maroons legend Chris Close.

Rugby league historian David Middleton said it was hard to argue Lockyer was in a class of his own.

"I believe Andrew Johns is a better footballer in his day - he changed the game in many ways - but Darren has Joey covered in terms of achievements."

The Sunday Mail (Qld)


http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,27359678-5018993,00.html
 

roopy

Referee
Messages
27,980

timka4

Bench
Messages
2,505
Joey was the better footballer - Lockyer had the better career.

I 100% agree with that statement. Joey had far too many injuries to compete with Lockyer for having the better career. But on his day, which was fairly regularly, Joey was the more dominant. Lockyer is still an absolute legend; obviously.
 

Burwood

First Grade
Messages
5,136
Longevity doesn't equal greatness. At club level I think Joey has a clear edge over Lockyer, but in rep games I think Lockyer has the more impressive record. But good to see that Raudonikis was a school the day they were taught hyperbole- "smashed him into ribbons" :roll:
 

Newynut

Juniors
Messages
106
I'd like to know their strike rate, i.e. which player had the highest average of wins against losses.

Has Locyer played in the front row for origin or Australia. Joey did when Anderson was in love with Kimorley.
 

88.Knights

Juniors
Messages
319
Andrew Johns will be the greatest player i've witnessed in my existance (and pretty dam lucky i reckon), i don't think there is one area in football ability that lockyer would surpass joey.

Asked to nominate his top-three players in recent times, former Blues skipper Steve Mortimer ranked Lockyer ahead of Johns, with Johnathan Thurston a distant third.

1. Andrew Johns
2. Darren Lockyer
3. Jonathan Thurston a very distant third, he could only make it on rep game form, apart from them he's pretty average:crazy:. but that's off topic.
 
Messages
16,034
LOL Lockyer's a legend, but lets see him carry the team of Nevilles like Joey did year in year out and still carry us into the finals. Imagine what Joey could have done in Lockyer's teams.
 

gUt

Coach
Messages
16,935
I'd like to know their strike rate, i.e. which player had the highest average of wins against losses.

I can't quote it to you but I heard on the radio not long ago that Lockyer has the highest win % of any player in NRL history. Don't know if that's right.
 

Yosh

Coach
Messages
12,564
100% with Roops.

In most sports, players are usually judged on what they have won, not how talented they were. Lebron James is a nuffie compared to Kobe Byrant because in the end Kobe is a winner.

Joey>Lockyer in terms of talent.

Lockyer>Joey as a Rugby League Player.
 

aqua_duck

Coach
Messages
18,765
What about individual honours?
Joey never played behind a pack with Webcke, Petero, Tallis, Carroll, etc.
 

Serc

First Grade
Messages
6,902
Really a nothing article guys...people should be happy with Johns being probably the most brilliant player ever, and Lockyer having one of the greatest playing records ever, and leave it at that.

Can you imagine Johns's playing record (and god-like status) if he had've played in the Broncos teams of the 90's and early 00's?
 

Yosh

Coach
Messages
12,564
Out of the players I've seen I'd put Webcke in my top 3 also. This guy pretty much summarised for me what Rugby League was all about. Till he wrote a book and teamed up with Matty that is...
 

red and blue

Juniors
Messages
162
Andrew Johns is the only player that I have ever seen able to win a game of football behind a badly beaten forward pack he used to do it every week.
He made the players around him look great and when he wasnt there they just couldnt win.
Hed have played longer if he wasnt so driven and played the game so hard.
And while Newcastle have struggled without him NSW have not won a series since either.
 

Noname36

First Grade
Messages
7,067
Surely they're taking the piss?

Even in Joey's later years, opposition players commented that he already had them beaten mentally before they even took the field.

Lockyer is a wonderful player, but he's never had the influence that Johns did.
 

Knightmare

Coach
Messages
10,715
This thread had me wishing, just for a moment, that Joey HAD signed with the Broncos at the end of 2000 after all. Had he moved north and played behind the likes of Webcke and Tallis and Civo, I don't think anybody would be saying with a straight face that Lockyer is better than Joey. FFS, Joey was pretty much the sole reason the Hagan years weren't rock bottom!
 

Latest posts

Top